The bar graph represents the consumption of fruits and vegetables by men women and children in Britain from 2001 to 2008
The bar graph illustrates the proportion of the men, woman and children of Great Britain who used to consumed parts of the fruits and vegetables daily from 2001 to 2008.
Overall, the woman had consumed a greater proportion of the fruits and vegetables as compared to the men and children in seven years whereas children consumed smaller proportion than other two.
As seen in the graph, there was an even equal difference of 5% among woman, men and children on the consumption of the fruits and vegetables in 2001 which consists women shared 22%, men had 17% and children consist 12%. The difference between women and other side, men and children began to increase, however, these difference decreases in 2006. In this year, women consumption proportion had reached the highest point which was more than 30% were as children consumption percentage was 25% and 20%.
After the 2006 period, the overall consumption proportion of the fruits and vegetables decreases till 2008. In 2008, the proportion of women consumption was 30% whereas men percentage was just above 20% and children share less than 25%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-05-14 | mangpahang | 67 | view |
- Some people say that industrial growth is necessary to solve poverty but some people argue that industry growth is creating environmental problems and it should will be stopped Discuss both views and give your opinion 82
- The following line graph shows the three different reasons of weight exports from 1985 to 1990 73
- The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now and plans for its development Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- At the present time the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults compared with the number of older people Do the advantages of this situation outweigh the disadvantages Give reasons for your answer and include any re 67
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 10, column 10, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...centage was 25% and 20%. After the 2006 period, the overall consumption pro...
^^
Line 10, column 239, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e 20% and children share less than 25%.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 3.97073170732 353% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 938.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12568306011 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63535319195 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.491803278689 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 254.7 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.9627501406 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.0 112.824112599 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1428571429 22.9334400587 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.85714285714 5.23603664747 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.457674171099 0.215688989381 212% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.228908191119 0.103423049105 221% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.121110906521 0.0843802449381 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.302026118773 0.15604864568 194% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.114420466657 0.0819641961636 140% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.0 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 24.0 40.7170731707 59% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.