At the present time, the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults, compared with the number of older people.
Do the advantages of this situation outweigh the disadvantages?
The shift of demographic structure is occurring in the world with a relatively significant increase of the young adult segment, leading to population proportion change. The debate follows with a primary point on whether the young adult percentage rise will bring more benefits. This essay attempts to impart facts on this convoluted issue.
Of course, the disadvantages are perceived since a young adult is still a tyro, with an inchoate mindset and attitude affecting their decision-making process. The immaturity may cause improper directions if the young adults face challenging issues professionally. For instance, due to a paucity of professional experiences, a young adult, serving as a manager in a start-up called Zero, tended to carry out a “trial and error” approach and then resulted in failure, bringing the new company to the brink of bankruptcy. This situation is in contrast to an established company led by older people whose personal and professional experiences have been proven along with time.
However, the young adult population increase will bring more benefits. Generally, with immense zeal and energy adhered to their body and mind, they will bring efficiency and productivity in professional work. This fresh and natural characteristic also supports them to think more creatively with better endurance compared to their older counterparts. While older ones quickly feel lethargic with a particular workload, young adults will show a more positive attitude; they are equipped with a willingness to learn new things and work relentlessly, leading to a more outstanding performance. To illustrate, Facebook and Gojek, led by young adult managers, produce unprecedented innovation and success, changing a national economic structure positively. Ideas shown by those decacorns represent young adults’ natural characteristics.
To conclude, professional inexperience possessed by young adults can be compensated with their immense positivity brought to professional work. Additionally, the weakness will dwindle as time goes by; Young adults will learn and absorb lessons to expand their experience over times. Therefore, I agree with the thesis on the advantages of having more young adults outweigh the disadvantages.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-17 | zanzendegi | 73 | view |
| 2024-06-20 | ThHuong | 78 | view |
| 2024-02-14 | MinyiChu | 73 | view |
| 2023-12-30 | xxlusubuxx | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-22 | englishessays | 73 | view |
- Nowadays many people prefer to use their own cars to commute rather than buses and trains Why do you think this is happening What can the government do to change it 90
- Doing an enjoyable activity with a child can develop better skills and more creativity than reading To what extent do you agree Use reasons and specific examples to explain your answer 84
- The graphs below show the enrolments of overseas students and local students in Australian universities over a ten year period 80
- The diagram below shows a possible future means of home energy production 11
- The education you receive from your family is more important than the education you receive from the school To what extent do you agree with this statement and why 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 833, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... young adults’ natural characteristics. To conclude, professional inexperience p...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, may, so, still, then, therefore, while, for instance, in contrast, of course, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1921.0 1615.20841683 119% => OK
No of words: 336.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.71726190476 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18555140296 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592261904762 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 595.8 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.0699274414 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.0625 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.9375 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.259792166262 0.244688304435 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0926585638968 0.084324248473 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0414442638977 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168152454124 0.151304729494 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00690665370934 0.056905535591 12% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.9 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.32 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 78.4519038076 153% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.