The table below shows the worldwide market share of the notebook computer market for manufacturers in the years 2006, 2007 and 2014.
The tabular chart represents the information about the several company's global market share in the computer market from 2006 to 2014.
Overall, it is apparent that throughout the years' HP is the major stockholder. However, the least number of shares acquired by Fujitsu.
It is conspicuous from the table that Dell was the company that had the largest variation in market share among other companies from 2006 to 2014. Initially, Dell had the 16.6% of the market share which surged to more than a quarter in 2014. HP is considered to be the dominant worldwide market share as it attained 31.4% of the share that substantially increased to 34.25% by the end of the timeframe. Furthermore, the rate of market shares of Samsung soared through the period, exceeding other companies in 2014 and reached 14.20% at the end of the period. In the meantime, the percentage of market share of Lenovo and Toshiba demonstrated a rise of about 2.5% in each company from the initial period to 2014. Conversely, the market share of Fujitsu halved in 2007, escalated in 2014 at 3.1%. On the other hand, other companies' share in the global market gradually slumped to 7.11 between 2006 and 2014.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-09-02 | thangnh37 | 67 | view |
| 2021-05-17 | krishyparms | 73 | view |
- Many people want their country to host an international sporting event Others believe that international sporting events bring more problems than benefits Write an essay 73
- The chart below shows what Anthropology graduates from one university did after finishing their undergraduate degree course The table shows the salaries of the anthropologists in work after five years 73
- Playing computer games only has negative effects on children To what extent do you agree or disagree 87
- The flow chart illustrates the consequences of deforestation 55
- A growing number of people feel that animals should not be exploited by people and that they should have the same rights as humans while others argue that humans must employ animals to satisfy their various needs including uses for food and research 68
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 900, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...adually slumped to 7.11 between 2006 and 2014.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, furthermore, however, so, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 985.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 201.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90049751244 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60836998343 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.502487562189 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 284.4 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.5613554297 43.030603864 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.5 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 5.23603664747 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.381800427469 0.215688989381 177% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.167115355479 0.103423049105 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0771753398976 0.0843802449381 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.239773560322 0.15604864568 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.118387597727 0.0819641961636 144% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.