The bar chart below shows the passenger kilometres traveled by different means of transport in the UK in 1990 and 2000. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The chart illustrates distance travelled by people using different types of transportation in the UK from 1990 to 2000.
Overall, buses and trains were the most preferred transports. Travelling by air, bus, rail and in total enjoyed upswings, while bicycle and motorbike witnessed opposite patterns.
In 1990, most people in the UK travelled by bus and train with the figure at 42 billion and 40 billion kilometres respectively. Both experienced relative growths and were equally represented at 50 billion in 2000. The total figure occupied the same trend, growing from 100 billion to 110 billion in the meantime.
Opposite patterns are evident distances for bicycles and motorbikes, at only 5 billion passenger kilometres in 1990. Moreover, there was a fall in both transports, which the figure declined to 4 billion in the next decade. Furthermore, a slight rise in the number of people travelled by aviation can be seen with 8 billion kilometres in 2000, compared to its lowest position at 5 billion in 1990.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-05-19 | Elvis Phuong | 78 | view |
- The graph below shows the percentage of immigrants to Australia from five countries in 1962 1982 and 2002 56
- The bar chart describes the sales of different goods in pounds in the UK over four seasons in 2015 87
- The graph shows the percentage of people who use mobile phones in four situations grouped by four age groups 80
- Some people believe that the salaries paid to professional sports people are too high while others argue that sports salaries are fair Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- The government should spend more money on medical research to protect citizens health rather than on protecting the environment Do you agree or disagree 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, moreover, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 858.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 165.0 196.424390244 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58402463422 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91995446334 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.606060606061 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 250.2 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.049553236 43.030603864 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.3333333333 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3333333333 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.55555555556 5.23603664747 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.149747090686 0.215688989381 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0695188583889 0.103423049105 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0792871403841 0.0843802449381 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114628475982 0.15604864568 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.088222010005 0.0819641961636 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.