There is no denying the fact that the social and environment more crucial in day to day in gunman beings lives. In the modern era, but few masses believe that visitors should be care social and environmentally responsibly in other side people said that not only duty of the visitors. I disagree with the given notion and I will examine my perspective views in the upcoming paragraph.
To commence with the factor of notion, there are considerable of the factor behind of rubric for doing protection of the social and environmental. Nowadays, the care of the surrounding area is tremendously significant in the world. However, there are coming visitors from another country to spend laser time. They are gathering information about the various culture. owing to this, they are doing care of the place .So, doing protection is necessary for the social and environment to them. This, if the environment social place is dual instead of bad impact on our economy.
On another side, the individual said that, the doing maintenance of social and the environment by living masses. Because visitors are spending more money on their lives due to they do not care. In addition, they are doing spend time without any responsibility. For instance, it is looking at on tourist area keep of security hard and made if community members, who are duty for maintenance of there. Resultingly, the acceptance of the duty of the community centre.
To sum up, it is irrefutable that the accept of responsibly everyone for protection of the social and environment. We can not neglect the duty. It is more necessary for human to comfortable living life.
- Wild animals have no place in the 21st century so protecting them is a waste of resources To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- The table shows the proportion of income spent on 4 common items in the UK in 1998 78
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships that people make Has this been a positive or negative development 66
- The chart shows the sales of five different kinds of jam from 2009 to 2014 84
- Some people claim that there are more disadvantages of the car than its advantages Do you agree or disagree Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of having a car 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 179, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'cared'?
Suggestion: cared
... masses believe that visitors should be care social and environmentally responsibly ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 368, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Owing
... information about the various culture. owing to this, in the tourist are more gainin...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 113, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...l and the environment by living masses. Because visitors are spending more money on the...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 361, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...ity hard and made if community members, who are duty for maintenance of there. Resultin...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 35, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
.... To sum up, it is irrefutable that the accept of responsibly everyone for protection ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, look, so, for instance, in addition, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1386.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 278.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98561151079 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89571696661 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.528776978417 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 452.7 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.4553746099 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.0 106.682146367 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.4444444444 20.7667163134 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.55555555556 7.06120827912 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215214361786 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0553850885768 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0651072649041 0.0667982634062 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123215739147 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0378181996427 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 13.0946893788 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.