In some cultures, children are often told they can achieve anything if they try hard enough. What are the advantages and disadvantages of giving children this message?
It is a popular saying for children in many cultures that once they make enough efforts, they can attain any of their goals. Akin to numerous other advice, this word of wisdom has its own merits and setbacks.
Concerning the advantages, this statement initiates a sense of self-esteem in children and stimulates them to work hard. First of all, as children are in the decisive process of constructing their perception, it is strategically vital to raise an awareness of confidence in them so that they grow up as self-reliant individuals. Therefore, boosting children to have faith in themselves is highly beneficial than discouraging them by saying that something is out of their reach. Moreover, motivating children to work earnestly for accomplishments is an efficient way of sowing seeds of diligence, an acclaimed dignity in children. There is no doubt that by being encouraged with such inspiring statements, children are more persistent and resilient to accept challenges and overcome obstacles in their life.
Given the disadvantages of this saying, it is likely to mislead children into pushing themselves too hard and oversimplifying the hurdles they confront. To begin with, as children mature with the idea that perseverance guarantees success, they are prone to put themselves into continual trials without any triumphs while neglecting other objectives that are of equal importance to their life. Furthermore, the belief in hard work can lure children into unrealistic goals. For example, a ten-year-old child may aspire to become a billionaire by the age of 15, which is rather impossible for children of that age and may even cause that child to ignore his study to focus on earning money.
In conclusion, even though a message about efforts and achievements may seem a sound advice, it is not totally flawless. Therefore, the moment at which children are told about this correlation needs careful consideration.
- The graph below shows information about the languages that 13 year old students in one school chose to study 91
- The line graph shows the percentage of New Zealand population from 1950 to 2050 73
- The bar chart shows the types of media that people of different age groups used to get daily news in one country in 2011 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 72
- The charts show the percentage of people working in different sectors in town A and B in two years 1960 and 2010
- The diagram below shows how instant noodles are made 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion, no doubt, first of all, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1626.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27922077922 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08759917725 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587662337662 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 499.5 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.5352309055 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.076923077 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6923076923 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.69230769231 7.06120827912 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.317444438234 0.244688304435 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110175051057 0.084324248473 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0697974226398 0.0667982634062 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185878629988 0.151304729494 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0364878395104 0.056905535591 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.64 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.