The bar chart shows the percentage of small , medium, large companies which used social media for business purposes between 2012 to 2016.
The bar graph details changes in the proportions of Australian companies in terms of their use of social media for business reasons from 2012 to 2016.
Overall, it is clear that all groups of companies in Australia experienced rises from 2012 to 2016, although in 2015 the figures fell for all sizes of companies. Large companies especially used social media more than the other groups.
In 2012, almost 30% of small companies used social media for business purposes. The figure for medium companies was slightly higher at just over 30%, while for larger companies the proportion stood at 80%. The following year, almost half of medium enterprises used social media for business reasons, whereas there was little or no change in the figures for small and large companies. There was little change in the percentages in 2014, although the figure for small companies saw an increase to almost 40%.
However, in 2015, the percentage of Australian companies using social media had decreased significantly to 30% by small and medium companies and to 55% by large companies. In contrast, the figure for small and medium companies increased to 49% and 50%, respectively. They also increased to 80% for large companies, returning to their levels of 2012 and 2013.
- Many people believe that it is easier to have a healthy lifestyle in the countryside Others believe that there are health benefits of living in cities Discuss both views and give your opinions 67
- People are surrounded by all kinds of advertising Some people believe that advertising has a negative effect on people s lives To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- People are surrounded by all kinds of advertising Some people believe that advertising has a negative effect on people s lives To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- The bar chart shows the percentage of small medium large companies which used social media for business purposes between 2012 to 2016 73
- The bar chart shows the percentage of small medium large companies which used social media for business purposes between 2012 to 2016 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, whereas, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1053.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 207.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08695652174 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79308509922 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63707943801 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.502415458937 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 300.6 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.1289644348 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.3 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.469580142936 0.215688989381 218% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.226489148218 0.103423049105 219% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.099230348911 0.0843802449381 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.315846532843 0.15604864568 202% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0491734245058 0.0819641961636 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.6 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.