The maps below show Colwick Arts Centre in 2005 and today Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

The maps illustrate the changes that have occurred in the plan of Clowick Arts Center from 2005 to the present.

Overall, the premises has been changed dramatically. The most noticeable alteration is the conversion of the wasteland into an outdoor exhibition area. In addition, several major changes have been made to the infrastructure.

In 2005, a wasteland was located on the south of the arts center; however, it has been replaced with an exhibition and performance area with a stage in the center, and a lot of greeneries in the surrounding space.

In terms of the main building, a central exhibition area has been added by relocating the concert hall/cinema. Now, the concert hall and the cinema are separate buildings, which are located on the right and in the north of the venue respectively. The concert hall now stands in the place of gallery 1 and gallery 2, which have now been relocated to the left as a single gallery. The snack bar has been demolished and 2 meeting rooms have been built with a new drama studio between them and the cinema. Furthermore, a new café has been added to the south of the gallery, while the toilet has been relocated to the south of the concert hall. However, the information desk has been remained unchanged over the period.

Votes
Average: 1.1 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...greeneries in the surrounding space. In terms of the main building, a central e...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, so, while, in addition

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1059.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 220.0 196.424390244 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81363636364 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85128510684 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76194251321 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522727272727 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 324.9 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.33902439024 230% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.1865339463 43.030603864 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.2727272727 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.09268292683 244% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0494566010139 0.215688989381 23% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0221936305893 0.103423049105 21% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0350171585649 0.0843802449381 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0457267058804 0.15604864568 29% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0437786451448 0.0819641961636 53% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.

Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.