Corporate sponsorship of sport in order to enhance public images is gaining popularity among operations. A segment of society believe that it brings some noticeable merits why others think some drawbacks could also be brought in to sports in general. This essay will further discuss both facets with appropriate examples then reach to a logical conclusion.
Sponsoring may greatly help raise overall skills and make matches more appealing. Overhead, running cost, purchasing quintessential equipment such as treadmills, all of which are extremely crucial for player’s training and young talents nourishments, can be covered by financial assistance from firms. Perhaps many potential young athletics’ talents would not have been flourished unless they had been well catered for a sustainable financial input. Match manipulation or unfair plays such as causing injuries to the opponents just for winning, which go against the so-called true sporting competitiveness, may be minimized if players are no longer entrepreneurially minded.
Monetary supports to sport clubs and induvial could be limited, begetting training interruptions and lack of running money. Perhaps most sponsors’ claims of dedication and persistence for nurturing talents or laying a concreate foundation for the developments of sports are hypocritical. Their initial objectives are most likely to be the return on their investments (commercial values), so as long as the sponsored clubs deliver impressive performances and thus raising companies’ visibility, the corporate sponsorships will be less likely to be withdrawn. As a result, an array of basic activities like training, renting accommodations or paying wages for professional coaches and players will no longer be covered.
To conclude, corporate sponsorships might result in true sport rivalries, as they usually increase common skills and restrain unsportsmanlike conduct. However, these assistances are normally unstable, which may act as a deterrent to the developments of teams and individuals
- While some people consider global warming to be the most pressing environmental problem which we have at the moment others believe that deforestation has a more devastating impact on our world Discuss both sides and give your opinion 84
- Some people believe that to protect local culture tourism should be banned in some areas Whereas others think that change is inevitable and banning tourism will have no benefits Discuss both and give your opinion 89
- Due to the development and rapid expansion of supermarkets in some countries many small local business are unable to compete Some people think that the closure of local business will bring about the death of local communities To what extent do you agree o 95
- Most people think that truth should be objective rather than subjective when it comes to news Do you think all news true What is the function of newspaper 89
- Some people think that it should be compulsory for people to retake their driving test every 5 years What are the advantages and disadvantages of doing this 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 29, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[5]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to raise' or 'raise'.
Suggestion: to raise; raise
...clusion. Sponsoring may greatly help raising overall skills and make matches more ap...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 161, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this assistance' or 'these assistances'?
Suggestion: this assistance; these assistances
...train unsportsmanlike conduct. However, these assistance are normally unstable, which may act as...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, may, so, then, thus, well, in general, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 24.0651302605 33% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1748.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.86577181208 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25340026829 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.674496644295 0.561755894193 120% => OK
syllable_count: 516.6 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.729153535 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.461538462 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9230769231 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.103881168651 0.244688304435 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0384670013833 0.084324248473 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0327410714466 0.0667982634062 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0620017632401 0.151304729494 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0185171285347 0.056905535591 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 13.0946893788 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.06 12.4159519038 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.72 8.58950901804 125% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 78.4519038076 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.