The graph below gives information about how people in the united kingdom spend their income. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main featurs and make comparisons where relevant.
At fleeting glance the line graph depicts the information regarding how the united kingdom spend their money on three things like food, education and entertainment. The data is calibrated on percentile.
Overall, the most striking feature apparent from this presentation is that maximum ratio of income spent by needy people on food. However, the uncausal feature that cannot be ignored that minimum percentage of their wealth spent on education.
Highlighting the presentaion it is clear that, the large proportion of income spent by poorest on food with 70% as compared to only 5% of richest. The middle class people spend their 40% to 30% of their total wealth on food. To add on, the maximum ratio of their money approximately 30% depleted by educated class on education while followed by poverty-stricken from 0% to 30% and carried by richest around 12%.
Furthermore, the total of one in three and a-quarter proportion of their expenses spent on entertainment by deep pocket and indigent respectively. The least, around 10% of their money consumed by working class.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2021-09-05 | ryannguyen0303 | 89 | view |
2021-06-07 | sonia 7022 | 67 | view |
2021-06-07 | sonia 7022 | 78 | view |
2021-06-07 | sonia 7022 | 78 | view |
2020-01-10 | Sushmabenarji | 88 | view |
- In some countries an increasing number of people are suffering from health problems as a result of eating too much fast food It is therefore neccesary for governments to impose a higher tax on this kind of food To what extant do you agree or disagree with 56
- The chart below show the proportion of holidaymakers using three diffrent types of in three diffrent years 73
- Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 56
- Below is a chart showing incidence of serious crime in a large UK city from December to november Total incidences of violent crime are show in addition to incidences of 4 serious crime types 73
- The bar chart below shows the number of miles travelled in a year by men and women for six different purposes in a particular country Summarise the information be selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 79
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, regarding, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 5.60731707317 232% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 907.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21264367816 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92178504522 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597701149425 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 266.4 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.823018503 43.030603864 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.777777778 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3333333333 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.22222222222 5.23603664747 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178642811494 0.215688989381 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0697785446125 0.103423049105 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0678157994264 0.0843802449381 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109809837145 0.15604864568 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0614073102854 0.0819641961636 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.