The graph below gives information about how people in the United Kingdom spend their income. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
At fleeting glance the graph depicts the information regarding how masses in the United Kingdom spend their wealth on three diffrent things food, education and entertainment. The data is calibrated in percentage.
Overall, the most striking feature apparent from this presentation is that maximum income is spend by the poorest on food. However, the uncasual feature that cannot be ignored that the minimum income is spend on the education.
Highlighting the presentation it is clear that, maximum ratio of poorest income is spend on food with 70% to 40% while followed by middle class people with 40% to 32% and carried by richest families with approximately 32% to 6%. The minimum ratio of wealth is spend by indigent on schooling with 0% to 30%. The maximum ratio of spent by working class with 30% to 28%. The least, percentage of their income is spent by the wealthy people with 28% to 12%.
Moreover, approximately a tenth to a quarter of salary is lay out by the poverty-stricken on entertainment while followed by educated class with just about a quarter to a tenth and carried by affluent people with around a tenth to a third.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2021-09-05 | ryannguyen0303 | 89 | view |
2021-06-07 | sonia 7022 | 67 | view |
2021-06-07 | sonia 7022 | 78 | view |
2021-06-07 | sonia 7022 | 78 | view |
2020-01-10 | Sushmabenarji | 88 | view |
- Level of youth crime are increasing rapidly in most cities around the world What are the reasons for this and suggest some solutions 58
- The chart below show the proportion of holidaymakers using three diffrent types of in three diffrent years 67
- People in all modern societies use drugs but today s youth are experimenting with both legal and illegal drugs at an early age Discuss the causes and some effects of widerspread drug use by young people in modern day society Make any recommendations you f 56
- Some people work for the same organisation all their working life Others think that it is better to work for different organisations Discuss both the views and give your opinion 56
- of people using multiple social networking site in Canada 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 94, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'spent'.
Suggestion: spent
... presentation is that maximum income is spend by the poorest on food. However, the un...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 204, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'spent'.
Suggestion: spent
...t be ignored that the minimum income is spend on the education. Highlighting the p...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 63, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'of the poorest'.
Suggestion: of the poorest
...ntation it is clear that, maximum ratio of poorest income is spend on food with 70% to 40%...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 84, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'spent'.
Suggestion: spent
...hat, maximum ratio of poorest income is spend on food with 70% to 40% while followed ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 261, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'spent'.
Suggestion: spent
...% to 6%. The minimum ratio of wealth is spend by indigent on schooling with 0% to 30%...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 369, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...spent by working class with 30% to 28%. The least, percentage of their income is sp...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, regarding, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 952.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90721649485 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86046714585 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.510309278351 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 279.0 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.6148671936 43.030603864 159% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.777777778 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5555555556 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.11111111111 5.23603664747 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177650815321 0.215688989381 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0743494148757 0.103423049105 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0673368116181 0.0843802449381 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11332454117 0.15604864568 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0656561141732 0.0819641961636 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.