The graph below gives information about how people in the United Kingdom spend their income.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons
where relevant
The given line chart illustrates how masses in the United Kingdom spend their wealth on three different purposes: food, education and entertainment.
Overall, the most striking sign from the chart is that while the most income is spent on food by the poorest, the wealthiest choose entertainment purposes. Additionally, it is also noted that education witnesses a minor investment.
It is crystal clear that spending savings on food purposes occupies the highest percentage of the poorest with over 70%, however it decreases rapidly to roughly 40% for the middle class and approximately 20% to 30% when reaching the elite. By contrast, the impoverished spend the minimum money on education and entertainment activities with a similar 5%. Simultaneously a significant enhancement is recorded when these purposes come to the figure for normal people with about 15% to 25% and 30%, respectively, before making up about 20% for the rich.
On the other hand, the wealthiest show a different way of spending, about a third of their earning is spent on entertainment activities. Meanwhile, education and food are less invested with 15% to 20% for the former and 5% to 20% for the latter.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-09-05 | ryannguyen0303 | 89 | view |
| 2021-06-07 | sonia 7022 | 67 | view |
| 2021-06-07 | sonia 7022 | 78 | view |
| 2021-06-07 | sonia 7022 | 78 | view |
| 2020-01-10 | Sushmabenarji | 88 | view |
- The diagram below shows the water cycle which is the continuous movement of water on above and below the surface of the Earth 95
- Writing task 1 IELTS 56
- The charts below show the results of a survey of the primary exercise objectives and locations of a selected group of adults between 20 and 50 years of age Summarise the information by selection and reporting the main features and make comparisons where r 86
- The bar graph below shows the percentage of immigrants to Australia from five countries in 1962 1982 and 2002 Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relavant 73
- A person s worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and material possessions Old fashioned values such as honour kindness and trust no longer seem important To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, third, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1000.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 192.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20833333333 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04179152141 2.65546596893 115% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59375 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 293.4 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.4038996363 43.030603864 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.0 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.75 5.23603664747 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.106803574638 0.215688989381 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0455427163364 0.103423049105 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0453912299609 0.0843802449381 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0686515873468 0.15604864568 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0466975875898 0.0819641961636 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.2329268293 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 11.4140731707 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.