the maps below show an art gallery in Australia in 1950 and now

The given maps depict details about the development in the structures of an Australian art gallery from 1950 up to now.

At first glance, it can be seen that the art gallery underwent a noticeable change by constructing many valuable functional parts. Besides, it is also noted that the primary function rooms still remain the same.

Initially, in 1950, the sculpture room was located in the center of the building, which could be entered by the entrance in front. In addition, to the left of the main hall, there were three service rooms including cafe, temporary exhibition and bookshop, which was built at an even size. By contrast, there was an art section on the right side divided into three smaller rooms namely early European Art, middle European Art and Australia Art, respectively. However, the whole building was partly surrounded by the courtyard to the Northside.

At present, the most striking sign is that the courtyard was totally demolished to make room for, from the left to the right, children art school, Australian Aboriginal Art and Australian Art. Simultaneously, the room which was used for Australian Art now has become the Asian Art room. Additionally, the cafe section was divided to make space for the restroom on the left side.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 213, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y function rooms still remain the same. Initially, in 1950, the sculpture room w...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, however, so, still, as to, in addition

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1058.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 210.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0380952381 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80675409584 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69905501226 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 106.607317073 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595238095238 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 314.1 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.510820314 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.8 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254335886526 0.215688989381 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0989689223829 0.103423049105 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107972141895 0.0843802449381 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176218596928 0.15604864568 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.108731221219 0.0819641961636 133% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.