The chart shows ways that schoolchildren get to school in three different countries

Essay topics:

The chart shows ways that schoolchildren get to school in three different countries.

The bar chart illustrates some transport children use to go to their school in Australia, the USA and the UK. At first glance, it is evident that cars are the most popular transport in the USA and the UK.
It can be seen from the chart that children in three separate countries use cars, school buses, bicycles, public transport and other transport or walk to the school. There are 40 percent and 39 percent of schoolchildren using cars in the USA and the UK respectively. Whereas the number of Australian children using cars is just over half compared to the USA. The second most popular transport is the school bus and children in the USA use it most, accounting for 37 percent.
The number of Australian and UK children walking to school is similar statistics, at 19 percent and 15 percent respectively, while the figure for the USA just occupies at a twentieth. Bicycles and public transport are selected by the minor quantity of schoolchildren. And the percentage of public transport is higher than that of bicycles by just under 15 percent. The minority of children decide to go to school by others

Votes
Average: 7.9 (3 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-11-21 ililmaidatuz 78 view
Essays by user www.www :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 51, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...art illustrates some transport children use to go to their school in Australia, the...
^^^
Line 2, column 179, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'percents'?
Suggestion: percents
...ort or walk to the school. There are 40 percent and 39 percent of schoolchildren using ...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 267, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ars in the USA and the UK respectively. Whereas the number of Australian children using...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, second, so, whereas, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 914.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73575129534 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79092387704 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.471502590674 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 270.9 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.8135449237 43.030603864 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.4 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.3 5.23603664747 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.127008214274 0.215688989381 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.058554468804 0.103423049105 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.06050198299 0.0843802449381 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0919801433302 0.15604864568 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0357870275467 0.0819641961636 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.44 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.