The bar chart below shows the top ten countries for the production and consumption of electricity in 2014. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart illustrates data about the ten countries with the highest electricity production and consumption levels in 2014. Overall, while China ranked first in both of them, the lowest figures were recorded in the Republic of Korea. Those of China were also higher than all the other countries combined.
In terms of electricity production, China was responsible for the largest contribution of nearly 5400 billion kWh, which was followed by the United States, with approximately 4100 billion kWh produced. In both nations, less electricity was consumed, at roughly 5.300 and 3.900 billion kWh, respectively.
Regarding other nations, the disparity between their figures and that of the aforementioned countries was quite considerable. A striking feature was that Russia had almost the same levels of electricity production and consumption, at over 1000 billion kWh. Other nations' figures were all under 1000, and Kor, in stark contrast with China, produced and consumed the least quantity of electricity, at 485.1 and 449.5 billion, respectively.
- Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmes for example working for a charity improving the neighbourhood or teaching sports to younger children To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
- The charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- In spite of the advances made in agriculture many people around the world still go hungry Why is this the case What can be done about this problem 89
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural and land becomes less productive The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and m 75
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, regarding, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 897.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 161.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.57142857143 4.92477711251 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56210296601 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95533406909 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.621118012422 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 261.0 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 75.7797560604 43.030603864 176% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.142857143 112.824112599 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.42857142857 5.23603664747 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.128678206282 0.215688989381 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0702255093429 0.103423049105 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0952178916133 0.0843802449381 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0927462400427 0.15604864568 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0583997315031 0.0819641961636 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.2329268293 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.32 11.4140731707 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.39 8.06136585366 116% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.