The graph below shows the percentage of part-time workers in each country of the United Kingdom in 1980 and 2010.
The above bar chart illustrates the part-time employees working in the United Kingdom during the three last decades. In brief, all the countries: England, Northern Ireland, Scotland and Wales, having at least 10% representative of part-time workers during the span, went through a moderate change of the worker composition.
England, Scotland, and Wales’s non-full-time labourer increased in percentage. In England, this minority segment stood at 25% of the total employment in 1980, and the number rose by 5% thirty years later. Then in other nations, an unnoticeable increase was witnessed by Wales shifting its part-time workers by only 2% in the same period, whereas Scotland’s part-time laborers had the highest hike amongst the rest; it started from the lowest percentage of 11% and afterward jumped by almost double in 2010 reaching 19%.
The rest country, Northern Ireland, became the antithesis of the three previous states. As opposed to those countries, this country’s part-time workers moderately declined by an inconsiderable percentage of 1% from 15% in 1980 to 14% in 2010. This drop was taken into account as the most minuscule percentage amongst the four nations in the United Kingdom.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-23 | hellocacban | view | |
| 2022-08-05 | kaushalpatel569 | 55 | view |
| 2022-06-01 | Elena Phan | 73 | view |
| 2022-02-14 | Vuthungan | 78 | view |
| 2021-11-14 | phuongquynh79 | 47 | view |
- Nowadays many people prefer to use their own cars to commute rather than buses and trains Why do you think this is happening What can the government do to change it 90
- The table below shows the results of surveys in 2005 2010 and 2015 about McGill University Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 95
- In surveys Mason City residents rank water sports swimming boating and fishing among their favorite recreational activities The Mason River flowing through the city is rarely used for these pursuits however and the city park department devotes little of i 79
- The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now and plans for its development Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The diagram illustrates how bees produce honey Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, then, whereas, at least, in brief
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1024.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 189.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41798941799 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70779275107 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90666469419 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 106.607317073 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.661375661376 0.547539520022 121% => OK
syllable_count: 293.4 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 73.0982857186 43.030603864 170% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.0 112.824112599 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.625 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.625 5.23603664747 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.320071941047 0.215688989381 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124033167857 0.103423049105 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0903742848712 0.0843802449381 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.215875970566 0.15604864568 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0446653043798 0.0819641961636 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.2329268293 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 11.4140731707 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.54 8.06136585366 118% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 40.7170731707 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.