The graph below shows the percentage of part-time workers in each country of the United Kingdom in 1980 and 2010.
The above bar chart illustrates the part-time employees working in the United Kingdom during the three last decades. In brief, all the countries: England, Northern Ireland, Scotland and Wales, having at least 10% representative of part-time workers during the span, went through a moderate change of the worker composition.
England, Scotland, and Wales’s non-full-time labourer increased in percentage. In England, this minority segment stood at 25% of the total employment in 1980, and the number rose by 5% thirty years later. Then in other nations, an unnoticeable increase was witnessed by Wales shifting its part-time workers by only 2% in the same period, whereas Scotland’s part-time laborers had the highest hike amongst the rest; it started from the lowest percentage of 11% and afterward jumped by almost double in 2010 reaching 19%.
The rest country, Northern Ireland, became the antithesis of the three previous states. As opposed to those countries, this country’s part-time workers moderately declined by an inconsiderable percentage of 1% from 15% in 1980 to 14% in 2010. This drop was taken into account as the most minuscule percentage amongst the four nations in the United Kingdom.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-23 | hellocacban | view | |
| 2022-08-05 | kaushalpatel569 | 55 | view |
| 2022-06-01 | Elena Phan | 73 | view |
| 2022-02-14 | Vuthungan | 78 | view |
| 2021-11-14 | phuongquynh79 | 47 | view |
- At the present time the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults compared with the number of older people Do the advantages of this situation outweigh the disadvantages 84
- The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now and plans for its development Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The diagram illustrates how bees produce honey Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The diagram below shows a possible future means of home energy production 11
- The graphs below show the enrolments of overseas students and local students in Australian universities over a ten year period 80
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, then, whereas, at least, in brief
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1024.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 189.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41798941799 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70779275107 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90666469419 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 106.607317073 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.661375661376 0.547539520022 121% => OK
syllable_count: 293.4 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 73.0982857186 43.030603864 170% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.0 112.824112599 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.625 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.625 5.23603664747 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.320071941047 0.215688989381 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124033167857 0.103423049105 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0903742848712 0.0843802449381 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.215875970566 0.15604864568 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0446653043798 0.0819641961636 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.2329268293 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 11.4140731707 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.54 8.06136585366 118% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 40.7170731707 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.