Some organisations believe that their employees should dress smartly. Others value quality of work above appearance.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
According to some organizations, that employees should dress smartly, while other organizations value the quality of work above appreance. I appreciate more quality of work above appearance.
In the modern world, many companies focus on employees' skills. They do not look after the dress-up. Dress up is one's personal choice. S/he can dressup according to their wish. Successful organizations like Microsoft, Apple, Google do not focus on employees' dress. Because they focus on work & skills. For this reason, their company is successful cause they look after employees' comfort. If an employee wears comfortable dress, s/he will feel comfortable in her work & he will able to give more focus on his or her particular works session. I appreciate the quality of work above experience cause work is the main focus & dress smartly is just show off but not comfortable for work.
Many organizations believe that employees should dress up smartly. Their appearance should be sophisticated. But smartly dress up does not help anyone at work. it looks good but for many, this is not comfortable or suitable for many employees. They do not feel good by wearing these dresses. For this reason, they do focus on their work. So, I do not appreciate dress smartly. It's a totally personal choice.
To conclude, Every organization should believe in the quality of work, not the dress-up. Cause smart dress-up will not bring success to the organization, the quality of work & the skill of employees will bring success. Dressup should be a personal choice. One's will dressup according to their comfort.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-25 | linh allie | 89 | view |
| 2024-07-25 | linh allie | 84 | view |
| 2023-07-29 | maria ayoub | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-27 | dolle123 | 56 | view |
| 2023-04-11 | johnlark1908 | 56 | view |
- The diagrams below show the design for a wave energy machine and its location 56
- The diagrams below show the design for a wave energy machine and its location
- Some people prefer to spend their lives doing the same things and avoiding change Others however think that change is always a good thing 84
- The chart shows the unemployment situation in Australia in the year 2012 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- Some people prefer to spend their lives doing the same things and avoiding change Others however think that change is always a good thing 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 265, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...Google do not focus on employees dress. Because they focus on work & skills. For this r...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 609, Rule ID: MAIN_FOCUS[1]
Message: Use simply 'focus'.
Suggestion: focus
...work above experience cause work is the main focus & dress smartly is just show off but no...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 161, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
... dress up does not help anyone at work. it looks good but for many, this is not co...
^^
Line 5, column 378, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: It's; It is
... So, I do not appreciate dress smartly. Its a totally personal choice. To conclu...
^^^
Line 7, column 257, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: One's
...s. Dressup should be a personal choice. Ones will dressup according to their comfort...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1338.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 257.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20622568093 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82021487749 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 176.041082164 68% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.466926070039 0.561755894193 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 391.5 506.74238477 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 5.43587174349 221% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 16.0721442886 143% => OK
Sentence length: 11.0 20.2975951904 54% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.6085699923 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 58.1739130435 106.682146367 55% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 11.1739130435 20.7667163134 54% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 1.04347826087 7.06120827912 15% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.309759542314 0.244688304435 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100050873687 0.084324248473 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0794772766779 0.0667982634062 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.231958411973 0.151304729494 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0632512645153 0.056905535591 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.7 13.0946893788 66% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.77 50.2224549098 137% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 11.3001002004 57% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 11.75 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.19 8.58950901804 84% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 78.4519038076 62% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 4.5 9.78957915832 46% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.4 10.1190380762 63% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.