Some organizations believe that their employees should dress smartly. Others value quality of work above appearance.
Discuss both these views and give you own opinion
Appearance and determination are two main factors organizations look for. When managers are hiring, they prioritize many various qualifications to create their perfect crew.
Some people say that their worker’s’ appearance attracts a large number of customers and encourages them to deal with this company. Dressing neatly and smartly gives an impression that this foundation is put together and has a well organized system and team. It most likely to promote professionalism such like what banks do, represent their institutions and advertise its purpose which will eventually as a result, they will get a good reputation so more new clients are pulled to them for the organization’s own benefit.
On the other hand, there are other people who believe that an employee’s quality of work and accuracy are a top tier priority. A well qualified productivity makes customers tend to use and buy that company’s products more often and even buy more products related to them. Gaining the clients trust by producing good content will help them choose a certain foundation to deal with over others like charities. Hard workers usually focus in their job to fulfill their goals that will benefit them and their organization.
Personally, I think that this depends on what kind of services that company offers and their method of dealing and working with their shoppers or clients. But at the end of the day, your working abilities will lead the employee and the organization they work for to the success they are looking forward to. Customers wont start dealing with them based on their looks but on their service.
Although many foundations have their neat dress code or uniform to represent their purpose they are promoting. But to me, I think quality of work should be more prioritized. They should focus more on determination while hiring, this will make them reach their goals faster.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-25 | linh allie | 89 | view |
| 2024-07-25 | linh allie | 84 | view |
| 2023-07-29 | maria ayoub | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-27 | dolle123 | 56 | view |
| 2023-04-11 | johnlark1908 | 56 | view |
- the chart and table below show customer satisfaction levels in th US with airlines and aspects of air travel in 1999 2000 and 2007 84
- Some organizations believe that their employees should dress smartly Others value quality of work above appearance Discuss both these views and give you own opinion 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Appearance and determination are two mai...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ations to create their perfect crew. Some people say that their worker’s’ app...
^^
Line 3, column 60, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...hat their worker’s’ appearance attracts a large number of customers and encourages them to deal w...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...benefit them and their organization. Personally, I think that this depends on...
^^^
Line 7, column 186, Rule ID: YOUR[1]
Message: Did you mean 'you're' or 'you are'?
Suggestion: you're; you are
... or clients. But at the end of the day, your working abilities will lead the employe...
^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...on their looks but on their service. Although many foundations have their nea...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, so, well, while, i think, in fact, kind of, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 24.0651302605 179% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1595.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 309.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16181229773 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80790544867 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588996763754 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 472.5 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.3391363273 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.333333333 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.93333333333 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22259468871 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0817844021459 0.084324248473 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0466108071705 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124877990267 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0242659035419 0.056905535591 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.