The flowering of the Internet has ushered in a new era of information access, parallel to the shifting of news reading from newspaper to online sources. People believe that traditional publication will still be a dominant element despite the rapid soaring of e-news. In my opinion, I tend to disagree with the assertion mentioned above due to two main reasons stated later in this essay.
First of all, one of the most pivotal factors making the press less appealing to readers is efficiency. At the same time, people have to wait till the next day to follow up headlines from the newspaper, online media such as Facebook, Twitter, etc. allow news subscribers to keep abreast of up-to-minute updates detailing what is happening from every corner of the world. This feature of e-news has played a crucial role to national leaders and entrepreneurs in making decisions influencing the future of a nation and the stock market.
In addition, the financial benefit is also a motivation persuading information followers to opt for digital news sources. In other words, readers are still able to reach more in-depth articles from the Internet without charging any fee. As a result, news subscribers could save a significant amount of money from not making daily subscriptions to the conventional newspaper.
In conclusion, the merits of online news, in terms of speed, competence and economy, have far outweighed that of demerits. Nonetheless, I believe
that traditional publication will no longer be the primary source in the near future.
- Although more and more people read news on the Internet newspapers will remain the most important source of news Do you agree or disagree 61
- Some people say job satisfaction is more important than job security othersthink people cannot always enjoy their jobs So having a permanent job ismore important Discuss both views and give your own opinion 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 146, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...that of demerits. Nonetheless, I believe that traditional publication will no lon...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, nonetheless, so, still, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, first of all, in my opinion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 24.0651302605 33% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1294.0 1615.20841683 80% => OK
No of words: 250.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.176 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88471835714 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.64 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 404.1 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 17.4180621451 49.4020404114 35% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 107.833333333 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8333333333 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.1666666667 7.06120827912 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.23025893308 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0706939812055 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0401182423642 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107700192897 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0475940626742 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.68 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.