Students are becoming more and more reliant on the internet. While the Internet is convenient, it has many negative effects and its use for educational purposes should be restricted.
The Internet has become one of the indispensable parts of people's lives as it embodies convenience and satisfies the requirements by providing users with data about their profession. Yet, in the educational field, students turn this valuable form of learning and consultation into a so-called system by considering it as nothing but a tool for doing their homework. Consequently, over-dependence is inevitable due to them not using their problem-solving skills on their own frequently and becoming lazy. I concur with the idea that the Internet could bring back potential detriments to our lives, but at the same time, I believe that the restriction of using the Internet for educational purposes should not be promulgated.
To commence with, I would argue about the Internet's deleterious side in education. Although it is indeed a crucial instrument for students and undergraduates to do researches and, it somehow provides a wide range of information including misleading data, which means that learners themselves have to take everything into careful consideration. Doing this requires an excessive amount of time, and they will have to face certain problems such as late presentation and decreased marks as the deadline can not be exceeded unless students suffer from diseases when embarking on the progress. In addition, overusing the Internet solely instead of utilizing available documentaries and narratives and having dialogues with peers could result in their sedentary lifestyle and the deterioration of interpersonal skills as they are occupied with examining information found on some websites. The more time they have their eyes glued to the computer screen also means that they have fewer chances to get involved in practical conversations with their partners, leading to plummeting productivity.
On the other hand, the limitation to the use of this convenient platform is too harsh because those aforementioned issues could be addressed if students allocate enough time equally and appropriately. Due to the Covid-19 pandemic outbreak, face-to-face communications are strongly restricted in public places to ameliorate the situation. Therefore, virtual video conferencing is an essential learning method as it helps teachers prevent their students from the lack of knowledge regardless of geographical boundaries. Moreover, it could indirectly act as a contributor to the increased well-being of individuals as the rate of being infected with this hazardous virus is minimized significantly.
In conclusion, while I understand that the cons of using the Internet are discernible, I am convinced that we ought not to put the restriction into practice as teachers can give students understanding about how to use the Internet effectively so that they could create more wealth to the society be becoming productive citizens through comprehending knowledge from recommended sources virtually
- Motor vehicle crashes are one of the leading causes of teen deaths To prevent such road accidents the government should ban people under 24 from driving motorcycles To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Students are becoming more and more reliant on the internet While the Internet is convenient it has many negative effects and its use for educational purposes should be restricted 89
- Some cities create housing areas by providing taller buildings Others create housing by building houses on a wider area of land What solution is better 84
- Today s teenagers have more stressful lives than previous generations Discuss this view and give your own opinion 50
- In the past shopping was a routine domestic task Many people nowadays regard it as a hobby To what extent do you think this is a positive trend 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, while, in addition, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 24.0651302605 166% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 64.0 41.998997996 152% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2468.0 1615.20841683 153% => OK
No of words: 440.0 315.596192385 139% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.60909090909 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57997565096 4.20363070211 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.29324063565 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 262.0 176.041082164 149% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595454545455 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 772.2 506.74238477 152% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 31.0 20.2975951904 153% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 73.3605855361 49.4020404114 148% => OK
Chars per sentence: 176.285714286 106.682146367 165% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.4285714286 20.7667163134 151% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.64285714286 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.28251808411 0.244688304435 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0868030429164 0.084324248473 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0814456895477 0.0667982634062 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17796598825 0.151304729494 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0850337697204 0.056905535591 149% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.7 13.0946893788 158% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 23.09 50.2224549098 46% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.7 11.3001002004 157% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.85 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.2 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 140.0 78.4519038076 178% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.1190380762 142% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.