The pie chart demonstrates the causes of worldwide land degradation in percent and the table explains how theses causes affected 3 different regions of the world during 1990s.
As the pie chart shows, the major causes of worldwide land degradation are 3 important reason of over-grazing, over-cultivation, and deforestation with approximately one third each.(35%,28%,and30% respectively)
Only 7% of loosing land in the world was due to other factors.
Between the 3 region of north America, Europe, and Oceania, the total land that was lost was highest in Europe with 23% and North America the lowest with 5% degradation.
Overgrazing was the most important cause of land loss in Oceania with 11.3% from total of 13%.
Defrostation was the number one reason of land degradation in Europe with 9.8% followed by overcultivation with 7.7% and overgrazing with 5.5%.
By contrast, In north america only 0.2% of land loss was due to deforestation and the high cultivation includes more than half of the causes.
- the mass extinction 70
- tpo-1 integrated writing; 3
- In 1912 a bookseller named Wilfrid M Voynich acquired a beautifully illustrated handwritten book manuscript written on vellum vellum is a material that was used for writing before the introduction of paper The Voynich manuscript as it became known resembl 27
- TPO-44 - Independent Writing Task Some people believe that when busy parents do not have a lot of time to spend with their children, the best use of that time is to have fun playing games or sports. Others believe that it is best to use that time doing th 60
- TPO 54. The Salton Sea in California is actually a salty inland lake. The level of salt in the lake's water—what scientists call its salinity—has been increasing steadily for years because the lake's water is evaporating faster than it is being repla 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 163, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'during the 1990s'.
Suggestion: during the 1990s
...fected 3 different regions of the world during 1990s. As the pie chart shows, the major cau...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, third
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 849.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 162.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24074074074 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56762134501 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.28718048722 2.65546596893 124% => OK
Unique words: 87.0 106.607317073 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.537037037037 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 245.7 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 54.2576159529 43.030603864 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.5 112.824112599 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0 22.9334400587 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.16666666667 5.23603664747 41% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 7.0 3.83414634146 183% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 1.13902439024 527% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.357513172107 0.215688989381 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.193131125587 0.103423049105 187% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.133775301349 0.0843802449381 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176568566308 0.15604864568 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.125207061734 0.0819641961636 153% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.2329268293 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 61.2550243902 86% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.51609756098 200% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 11.4140731707 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 21.0 11.4329268293 184% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.