The table shows the results of a survey of people’s perception of celebrity news coverage.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The table plots the results of a poll about individuals’s discernment of well-known people news coverage.
Overall, respondents thought that there was too much news about celebrities on television news and news organisations should have responsibility for that.
The vast majority of those asked (85%) believed that famous people received too much news coverage. Meanwhile, only 6% of people complaint of the little news about the stars and the percentage of people thought that there was a right amount was 7%.
Over half of people (56%) agreed that news organisations should be to blame. However, 34% of people considered that the public are the one who should have responsibility for while only a small proportion of them (7%) blamed both.
Television news were said to give the superstars the most with coverage (60%) followed by internet news websites, newspapers and radio news with 15%, 12% and 5% respectively. Otherwise, only 3% of people thought differently, it was the others, not the aforementioned factors.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-06-26 | lili__nhnh | 49 | view |
- The graphs below show the enrolments of overseas students and local students in Australian universities over a ten year period Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The graph below shows the number of passenger railway journeys made in Great Britain between 1950 to 2004 05 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The chart below shows the total number of Olympics medals won by twelve different countries Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 100
- The graph below shows in percentage terms the changing patterns of domestic access to modern technology in homes in the UK 59
- The graph shows the percentage of UK adolescents following a vegetable diet Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, well, while, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 20.0 33.7804878049 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 855.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 163.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24539877301 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57311423478 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04940685313 2.65546596893 115% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.59509202454 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 252.0 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.6678358634 43.030603864 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.875 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.375 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.875 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175634839528 0.215688989381 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0832915395212 0.103423049105 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0373268590707 0.0843802449381 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10802112498 0.15604864568 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0289083748891 0.0819641961636 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.