lmao
The given argument states that mimicking the way our ancestors ate can help cure the various chronic diseases of present age and time. I highly disagree with the conclusion made, as the theories on which this argument has been made are riddled with holes. Many fallacies are at play.
The advocates and people who support the consumption of the acclaimed Paleo Diets, the food intake method, also claim that human bodies have evolved over time to eat these types of diets. This is a fallacy, as there is absolutely no evidence provided which proves that our bodies have evolved to consume similar types of food that our ancestors also consumed. Firstly, the present generation is so technologically advanced and the way humans behave/ commute/ eat/ work has drastically changed. In the past, humans walked for several hours in the search of food, they exerted themselves physically, they lived under the sun and many kept moving from place to place like nomads, in search of food and shelter. All of this would have surely helped them in developing high immunity and anti-bodies. And the pollution levels/ climatic conditions were not so bad in those halcyon times. Contrastingly, global warming has increased at an alarming rate, and so have the number of accidents occurring on a daily basis, because of the exponentially increasing population and also the ever-growing modernization. So there’s a very high possibility that the evolved generation has developed different food traits.
Furthermore, there is a mention of bone broth, a soup that is cooked by boiling animal bones for long hours, which comes under Paleo diets. There is no credibility for the statement that the health-promoting nutrients present in the bones of animals will actually do any good for human bones and health too. Sure, cartilage helps in healing bones and chondroitin helps with nerve regeneration, but ingesting animal broth soup is not going to have the same effect as the nutrients themselves. It is established that there is anecdotal evidence for the fact that people who intake bone broth soup have fewer metabolic and inflammatory diseases than those who don’t. Firstly anecdotal evidence isn’t proof enough because it is based on experiences and not on facts. Secondly, we don’t have sufficient statistics as to how many people does this account for and how many people were actually surveyed and tested. If the numbers are modicum, then this attempt at collecting evidence and concluding from it is futile.
Taking the same point into consideration, if it is assumed that the surveys did take place in a proper manner with sufficient statistics to go along with it, even then it could have been the case that the person was following other nutrition-filled and healthy food diets, which also just happened to include broth soup by chance, and that is why he/she is prone to lesser inflammatory and metabolic diseases. It could have also been the case that the people who didn’t consume broth soup and were surveyed, already might have been suffering from other diseases.
There are innumerable such ways in which the argument can be proved fallible. Proper evidence and results from credible surveys can help in bolstering the given argument.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-07-02 | jaded_monkey | 68 | view |
- Some people believe that corporations have a responsibility to promote the well being of the societies and environments in which they operate Others believe that the only responsibility of corporations provided they operate within the law is to make as mu 66
- jkdsaldisadehccxzza 16
- The following appeared in a memorandum from the owner of Movies Galore a chain of movie rental stores In order to stop the recent decline in our profits we must reduce operating expenses at Movies Galore s ten movie rental stores Since we are famous for o 58
- lmao 68
- The following is an excerpt from a speech given to the School Board about a change to the curriculum Because the future will be dominated by technology we must make four years of computer programming mandatory for all high school students If our students 71
Comments
e-rater score report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 4.0 out of 6
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 8 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 10 2
No. of Sentences: 21 15
No. of Words: 537 350
No. of Characters: 2644 1500
No. of Different Words: 273 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.814 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.924 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.668 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 175 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 132 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 91 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 62 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 25.571 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 13.783 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.667 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.278 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.278 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.087 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 1 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 92, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a proper manner" with adverb for "proper"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...assumed that the surveys did take place in a proper manner with sufficient statistics to go along ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, then, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 19.6327345309 138% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.9520958084 62% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 11.1786427146 197% => OK
Relative clauses : 22.0 13.6137724551 162% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 28.8173652695 139% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 53.0 55.5748502994 95% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 16.3942115768 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2719.0 2260.96107784 120% => OK
No of words: 532.0 441.139720559 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11090225564 5.12650576532 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.80261649409 4.56307096286 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73534607029 2.78398813304 98% => OK
Unique words: 274.0 204.123752495 134% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.515037593985 0.468620217663 110% => OK
syllable_count: 855.9 705.55239521 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.96107784431 141% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.76447105788 57% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.70958083832 185% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.67365269461 239% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.22255489022 71% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 19.7664670659 111% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.8473053892 105% => OK
Sentence length SD: 73.95169576 57.8364921388 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.590909091 119.503703932 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1818181818 23.324526521 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.95454545455 5.70786347227 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.25449101796 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.20758483034 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 6.88822355289 73% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.67664670659 107% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.271174336095 0.218282227539 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0679093572687 0.0743258471296 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0685886641322 0.0701772020484 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114794752999 0.128457276422 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0841389305063 0.0628817314937 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 14.3799401198 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 48.3550499002 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.197005988 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.5979740519 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.32208582834 105% => OK
difficult_words: 132.0 98.500998004 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 12.3882235529 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.1389221557 104% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.9071856287 109% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.