The average standard of people's health is likely to be lower in the future than it is now.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
It has been predicted that the well-being of people could be ruined exceedingly in accordance of its current status. Certainly, what I reckon is that owing to dreadful reasons, people's health system might be in danger.
To engender with, having a range of junk food options is firstly cause health and invite serious issues, be it obesity or skin hazards. Undeniably, people now have strared to relying on it since fast food has a splendid test l, which neither satisfies their inner body, nor willingness. Because of having tried one fast food, there could be a probability for testing another one . Hence, it will destroy health and consequently individuals will have reeled with cardiovascular griefs.
Moreover, if denizens attention on maintaining the health cannot be drwan to serious problems, there will be a plunge of health level. To elaborate it, a strict diet plan should be followed although it is challenging. By practicing this, the probability of awful health problems will be a zero. For example, if a person takes 600 to 700 steps daily and eat less on the night and high in the morning, the risk of loosing immunity power can be lost.
In conclusion, since there is a devoid of control on eating options as well as a deception with diets, a stranded of people health experiences a fluctuations. Surprisingly, it remains same, masses should up to deal with hazardous health threats.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-30 | UYEN NGUYEN DO TO | 56 | view |
| 2023-08-30 | UYEN NGUYEN DO TO | 61 | view |
| 2023-05-07 | vuhungbo | 78 | view |
| 2023-03-15 | Areeb Rooman | 73 | view |
| 2023-03-15 | Areeb Rooman | 73 | view |
- The widespread use of the internet has a bad effect on people development.What are the problems Suggest some solution 73
- The chart below show the proportion of the energy produced from different source in a country between 1985 and 2003 61
- Nowadays many children are playing computer games instead of doing sports activities Why is it happening Is it a negative or positive development 84
- The graph below gives information about U..S government spending on research between 1980 and 2008. 73
- The diagram below shows the stages in the recycling of aluminium drink cans 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 66, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'caused'.
Suggestion: caused
...a range of junk food options is firstly cause health and invite serious issues, be it...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 155, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sity or skin hazards. Undeniably, people now have strared to relying on it since ...
^^
Line 3, column 380, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...be a probability for testing another one . Hence, it will destroy health and cons...
^^
Line 3, column 381, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...e a probability for testing another one . Hence, it will destroy health and conse...
^^
Line 7, column 144, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a fluctuation' or simply 'fluctuations'?
Suggestion: a fluctuation; fluctuations
...a stranded of people health experiences a fluctuations. Surprisingly, it remains same, masses ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, firstly, hence, if, moreover, so, well, for example, i reckon, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1174.0 1615.20841683 73% => OK
No of words: 235.0 315.596192385 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99574468085 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91531732006 4.20363070211 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84085443002 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.63829787234 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 342.0 506.74238477 67% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.140520409 49.4020404114 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 97.8333333333 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5833333333 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.08333333333 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217268676678 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0829709039656 0.084324248473 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0396163195243 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133015219115 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0234171191936 0.056905535591 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.95 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.