It is a natural process for animals to become extinct. There is no reason why people should prevent this from happening. Do you agree or disagree
In this day and age, the world has recorded the demise of thousands of species, yet there is currently a contentious argument over whether people should not take action against the extinction of some animals. In my point of view, I strongly disagree with this opinion for the reasons provided below.
The first justification is that a host of animals in the wildlife has been scientifically proven to be beneficial to people’s lives. It is undeniable that animals are the main food resources that bring valuable nutrition to help nurture and maintain our health fitness. Moreover, animals also play a pivotal role in monitoring the ecological balance and fertilize the biodiversity of wildlife, which is the contributory factor to our environmental-friendly vicinity.
In addition to this, given the inseparable relationship between the human race and wildlife, it is absurd to downplay the importance of protecting threatened species. In other words, even if a single wild species is missing from ecosystem, it may disrupt the whole food chain, ultimately leading to disastrous results for human life. Moreover, when discussing a country’s economic growth, comes the appearance of a large influx of animals that has become the main thriving income of entrepreneurs throughout the role of the most welcome soliciting characters in the national circus or in some of the safaris such as Phu Quoc Safari or Saigon Zoo. Therefore the decline in the number of animals has understandably provoked widespread concern regarding socio-economy background.
In conclusion, I am of the opinion that it is the interest of mankind to put more effort into protecting wild animals.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-07-03 | TRAN NGOC LINH | 78 | view |
- The charts show the percentage of people working in different sectors in Towns A and B in two years 1960 and 2010 73
- The charts below show the proportion of people s spending on different commodities and services in a particular European country in 1958 and 2008 84
- People think that government should increase the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles to solve environmental problems Give your opinion 78
- The chart below shows the results of a British survey taken in 2005 related to the housing preferences of people in the UK 67
- The table compares the numbers of five different kinds of vehicles that were registered in Australia in three different years 2010 2012 and 2014 78
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 468, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...to our environmental-friendly vicinity. In addition to this, given the inseparab...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 589, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...characters in the national circus or in some of the safaris such as Phu Quoc Safari or Saig...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 649, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...such as Phu Quoc Safari or Saigon Zoo. Therefore the decline in the number of animals ha...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, moreover, regarding, so, therefore, in addition, in conclusion, such as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1420.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 265.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35849056604 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19824622643 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.633962264151 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 448.2 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 59.9500625521 49.4020404114 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.0 106.682146367 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5 20.7667163134 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.4 7.06120827912 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169592976808 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0556374828796 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0433190120506 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0839023485764 0.151304729494 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0658620569196 0.056905535591 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.29 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 468, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...to our environmental-friendly vicinity. In addition to this, given the inseparab...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 589, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...characters in the national circus or in some of the safaris such as Phu Quoc Safari or Saig...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 649, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...such as Phu Quoc Safari or Saigon Zoo. Therefore the decline in the number of animals ha...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, moreover, regarding, so, therefore, in addition, in conclusion, such as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1420.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 265.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35849056604 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19824622643 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.633962264151 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 448.2 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 59.9500625521 49.4020404114 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.0 106.682146367 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5 20.7667163134 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.4 7.06120827912 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169592976808 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0556374828796 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0433190120506 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0839023485764 0.151304729494 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0658620569196 0.056905535591 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.29 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.