The charts below show the proportion of people’s spending on different commodities and services in a particular European country in 1958 and 2008
The pie charts compare the expenditure on a variety of goods and services percentagewise recorded in a European country during 50 years, starting in 1958.
Overall, it is clear that the percentage of money spent on food was dominant in 1958; nonetheless, 50 years later, Housing became the biggest contribution of the expenditure on commodities and services. Meanwhile, the lowest segment in 1958 was made up by the expenditure on Luxury goods; however, in the year 2008, Entertainment became the least sector that people poured money into.
With regard to Housing, Luxury goods and Travel/ transport, they all underwent an increasing trend. At the beginning of the period, the housing sector accounted for 22%, which ranked top in 1958; nevertheless, It slightly rose to 32 % in 2008. The figure for Luxury goods and Travel/ transport went up exponentially over 50 years from 7 % and 8 % respectively, eventually reaching double what they were at the start of the period.
As opposed to the aforementioned trend, Clothing, Entertainment and Food recorded a reverse pattern of decreasing between 1958 and 2008. It is evident that the percentage for clothing reduced modestly from 18 % to 16 %. As was represented, between 1958 and 2008 usage of clothing and entertainment halved from 18 % and 13% to 12% and 6 % respectively, which was the two smallest segments of the pie chart shown in 2008.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-07-04 | TRAN NGOC LINH | 84 | view |
- People think that government should increase the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles to solve environmental problems Give your opinion 78
- The charts show the percentage of people working in different sectors in Towns A and B in two years 1960 and 2010 73
- The line graph shows the percentage of New Zealand s population from 1950 to 2050 73
- films were produced by big companies in the past but today people are able to make a film Do you think this trend is positive or negative 78
- The table compares the numbers of five different kinds of vehicles that were registered in Australia in three different years 2010 2012 and 2014 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, nevertheless, nonetheless, while, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1171.0 965.302439024 121% => OK
No of words: 227.0 196.424390244 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15859030837 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88156143495 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07615434367 2.65546596893 116% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 106.607317073 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581497797357 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 330.3 283.868780488 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.4615348506 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.111111111 112.824112599 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2222222222 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.88888888889 5.23603664747 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172882977268 0.215688989381 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0702251394861 0.103423049105 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0626866991546 0.0843802449381 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113254085699 0.15604864568 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0599105747842 0.0819641961636 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.2329268293 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 40.7170731707 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.