The charts below show the proportion of people’s spending on different commodities and services in a particular European country in 1958 and 2008
The pie charts compare the expenditure on a variety of goods and services percentagewise recorded in a European country during 50 years, starting in 1958.
Overall, it is clear that the percentage of money spent on food was dominant in 1958; nonetheless, 50 years later, Housing became the biggest contribution of the expenditure on commodities and services. Meanwhile, the lowest segment in 1958 was made up by the expenditure on Luxury goods; however, in the year 2008, Entertainment became the least sector that people poured money into.
With regard to Housing, Luxury goods and Travel/ transport, they all underwent an increasing trend. At the beginning of the period, the housing sector accounted for 22%, which ranked top in 1958; nevertheless, It slightly rose to 32 % in 2008. The figure for Luxury goods and Travel/ transport went up exponentially over 50 years from 7 % and 8 % respectively, eventually reaching double what they were at the start of the period.
As opposed to the aforementioned trend, Clothing, Entertainment and Food recorded a reverse pattern of decreasing between 1958 and 2008. It is evident that the percentage for clothing reduced modestly from 18 % to 16 %. As was represented, between 1958 and 2008 usage of clothing and entertainment halved from 18 % and 13% to 12% and 6 % respectively, which was the two smallest segments of the pie chart shown in 2008.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-07-04 | TRAN NGOC LINH | 84 | view |
- the bar chart below shows the most important causes of stress for different age groups in canada 87
- Economic growth in recent years in both developed countries and developing countries made some people richer However research shows that people in developing countries are happier people in developed countries seem not happier than before Why does this ha 78
- films were produced by big companies in the past but today people are able to make a film Do you think this trend is positive or negative 78
- People think that government should increase the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles to solve environmental problems Give your opinion 78
- Society is based on rules and laws It could not function if individuals were free to do whatever they wanted to do To what extent do you agree or not 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, nevertheless, nonetheless, while, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1171.0 965.302439024 121% => OK
No of words: 227.0 196.424390244 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15859030837 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88156143495 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07615434367 2.65546596893 116% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 106.607317073 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581497797357 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 330.3 283.868780488 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.4615348506 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.111111111 112.824112599 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2222222222 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.88888888889 5.23603664747 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172882977268 0.215688989381 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0702251394861 0.103423049105 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0626866991546 0.0843802449381 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113254085699 0.15604864568 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0599105747842 0.0819641961636 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.2329268293 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 40.7170731707 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.