The bar chart compared the spending of France and England on five different items in 2010. Units are measured in pounds sterling.
Overall, it is noteworthy that the UK spent more money on goods while France spent less in the period given. Additionally, the British paid more for cars, books and cameras than the French and they spent more on computers and perfume than the UK residents.
In terms of cars, the highest expenditure was in Britain at around 450.000 pounds compared to France at 400.000 pounds. Similarly, the UK spent more on books than French people, with the figures standing at just above 400.000 pounds and 300.000 pounds respectively. In addition, over 350.000 pounds were spent on cameras in the UK, over double that of France, which was 150.000 pounds.
On the other hand, the outgoing on computers in France was the highest at under 400.000 pounds, which was slightly higher than Britain standing at 350.000 pounds. A parallel trend can be seen in perfume. Neither of the two countries spent much on this item which accounted for 200.000 pounds in France but under 150.000 pounds in the UK.
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010 67
- The table blow gives information about consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002 78
- Many people still believe that riding a bicycle is the best way to get to places What are the advantages and disadvantages of using a bicycle these days 89
- The maps show improvements that have been made to a university campus between 2010 and the present day Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The map shows the development of Meadowside village and Fonton over three different time periods 1962 1985 and present Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, similarly, while, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 935.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92105263158 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36484525388 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.526315789474 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 246.6 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.5917479298 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.5 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.7 5.23603664747 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.057823974923 0.215688989381 27% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0279289624541 0.103423049105 27% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0396915911616 0.0843802449381 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0456730354432 0.15604864568 29% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0322157381166 0.0819641961636 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.4 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.