The chart below shows the changes that took place in three different areas of crime in Newport City center from 2003 - 2012. Summarize and information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph illustrates the number of incidents in Newport City center caused by three particular crime fields including burglary, car theft, and robbery over a 10-year period starting from 2003.
In general, the initial impression from the chart is that there was a major decrease in terms of burglary incidents whereas the car theft and robbery rates showed some fluctuations at varying degrees and its figures did not decline much.
As can be seen, with approximately 3500 cases, burglary was the main reason causing volumes of crime incidents, more than twice the figure for the second-largest crime contributor, car theft. In contrast, the number of cases due to robbery theft started at significantly lower than their burglary and car theft counterparts, sevenfold and fivefold respectively. The subsequent year saw an overall increase for all three types of crime. The figure for burglary incidents surged greatly, reaching its highest point at 3800 cases. By contrast, the number of both car theft and robbery theft offenses rose marginally to peak at 3200 and 900 respectively.
In the next four years, it is notable that a downward trend was observed for cases by burglary. Its figure declined significantly, with some fluctuations reaching a low of 1200 in 2008, before recovering and stabilizing at under 1500 in 2012. Similarly, car theft rates fell by a further 1000 to 2000 incidents, about two times the quantity of robbery theft cases that took place in 2008. From the middle of the year 2006, the figure for the former saw a great recovery to surpass burglary levels to become the major problem in Newport City. After mild ups and downs, in 2012 the number of the latter still remained unchanged at 700 cases, the same as its 2003 levels.
- The diagram below shows the average hours of unpaid work per week done by people in different categories Unpaid work refers to such activities as childcare in the home housework and gardening 78
- The graph below shows the unemployment rates in the US and Japan between March 1993 and March 1999 79
- The line graph below shows the number of single family homes constructed in the United States by region over a period of six years Summarize the information by selecting and reporting in the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The diagram below shows the average hours of unpaid work per week done by people in different categories Unpaid work refers to such activities as childcare in the home housework and gardening 73
- The line graph shows the percentage of New Zealand s population from 1950 to 2050 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, second, similarly, so, still, whereas, in contrast, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1472.0 965.302439024 152% => OK
No of words: 293.0 196.424390244 149% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02389078498 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 3.73543355544 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69051968985 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 106.607317073 158% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.57337883959 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 433.8 283.868780488 153% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 11.0 3.36585365854 327% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.1003585187 43.030603864 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.666666667 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4166666667 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.91666666667 5.23603664747 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.110447061837 0.215688989381 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0428733635406 0.103423049105 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0435710724616 0.0843802449381 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0850636851763 0.15604864568 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0452697569092 0.0819641961636 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.2329268293 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 40.7170731707 179% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 11.4329268293 162% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.