It can not be denied by anyone that after technological revolution electronic devices are more affordable to people which had not been possible in the past. Nowadays we see that the presence of our fingerprints is always on the screen of the handheld devices. While some believe that, the availability of such gadgets make distance between the social classes, others have the idea that it takes us closer, and removes the distance. In the following paragraphs, both views will be discussed, and from my side I go with the latter statement.
On the one hand, certain achievement of technology is not affordable for everyone in the society, therefore a distance always remains between the classes. For example, when an advanced medical treatment is invented such as chemotherapy because of the high cost the poorer people are not able to bear the expense as a consequence they have to depend on the conventional treatment. In addition, upper class people can spend a lot of money to keep their body fit by using various machines such as lat pull down, while the lower class people can not afford to buy or use it.
On the other hand, new technology makes it possible to give every facility at a reasonable price such as Wi-Fi which is available everywhere all around the world. All classes of people can use different social websites which are very helpful to decrease the distance between the people. For instance, through these web portals a man or a woman can share his or her thoughts and ideas, whether he or she is poor or rich people do not think about it, if it is positive everyone appreciates it. Furthermore, online shopping is accessible for everyone, people can buy whatever he wants whenever he wants through different online sources, as a result, distance is decreased a lot.
In conclusion, the new inventions can reduce the gap between the classes, while certain technology makes it more polarize. So, I can say in the future technology will be successful to remove the distance among the people.
- The graph shows estimated oil production capacity for several Gulf countries between 1990 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- International student enrolment in British universities 2009 2014 78
- The pie chart shows the amount of money that a children s charity located in the USA spent and received in one year 2016 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The table below shows the percentage of the population and the types of houses they live in 3 areas of a city Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The graph below compares the number of visits to two new music sites on the web Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below 73
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1677.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 344.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.875 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30665032142 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72382169711 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572674418605 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 542.7 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 39.149841113 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.0 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.4615384615 20.7667163134 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2307692308 7.06120827912 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.218182601177 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0696875615598 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0339473422457 0.0667982634062 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123444034764 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0378591214905 0.056905535591 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1677.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 344.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.875 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30665032142 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72382169711 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572674418605 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 542.7 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 39.149841113 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.0 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.4615384615 20.7667163134 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2307692308 7.06120827912 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.218182601177 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0696875615598 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0339473422457 0.0667982634062 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123444034764 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0378591214905 0.056905535591 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.