The graphs below compare the average weekly earnings of male and female graduates and non-graduates.
The bar chart shows the changes in the money male and female graduation and non-graduation can make every week from 16 to 59 years old.
Overall, graduate men and women earn more money than their non-graduate peers and men earn more than women from 20 years old. Meanwhile, the older male staff are, normally the higher the weekly income they can have, while a different pattern can be seen in female career path.
Before graduate, men and women started from a similar weekly income that is just over 200 euros. However, males earn more salaries than females regardless of their educational background, rising to 350 euros every week for male graduates and 320 for non-graduates, while 310 euros for female graduates and less than 300 for non-graduates.
Between 24 and 49 years old, weekly income for graduate and non-graduate men saw a significant increase, to over 700 and about 600 euros per week respectively. Since then, weekly earnings for male non-graduates shows a slight drop to 580 while those for graduates keep rising to the peak at 730 euros per week.
Unlike the increasing trend in male’s general salary, the earning rising for female graduates and non-graduates stops after 29 years old, with the highest point at 420 euros and 330 euros weekly separately. After that, the weekly income for graduate women fluctuated around 410 euros and those for non-graduate ones witnesses a decrease between 30 and 59 years old.
- the diagram below shows how raw materials are used to make plastic products
- The graphs below give information about computer ownership as a percentage of the population between 2002 and 2010 and by level of education for the years 2002 and 2010 78
- It is a waste of money for the government to spend money on space travel or space exploration. 76
- In some countries parents arrange marriages for their children but in others people choose their own marriage partner What are the advantages and disadvantages of each system 78
- 11 The chart below shows numbers of incidents and injuries per 100 million passenger miles travelled PMT by transportation type in 2002 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 312, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sing to the peak at 730 euros per week. Unlike the increasing trend in male’s ge...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 14.0 6.8 206% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1209.0 965.302439024 125% => OK
No of words: 240.0 196.424390244 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0375 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93597934253 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64312197032 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 106.607317073 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5375 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 353.7 283.868780488 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.07073170732 467% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.7976034155 43.030603864 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.333333333 112.824112599 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.6666666667 22.9334400587 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.66666666667 5.23603664747 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.418060762903 0.215688989381 194% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.221480575397 0.103423049105 214% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0927682793245 0.0843802449381 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.298184633594 0.15604864568 191% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0333642756283 0.0819641961636 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.2329268293 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.