The maps depict the differences in the rearrangement of a trade conference in 2009 and 2010.
Overall, the conference room has witnessed significant changes over the course of one year, the most immediately prominent of which is the refreshment room replacing the registration area, as well as the modernization seen in the south-eastern and south-western part of the layout.
As per the map, the concert hall and the meeting room has been merged and relocated to the place which used to be an exhibition room. Vice versa, the exhibition area has been resituated to the merged room which in turn, can provide a larger space for different purposes. In addition, the display area, which aligned itself with the aforementioned area and the balcony, has been removed in 2010.
Moreover, another worth-noticing detail is the construction of a new registration room, which is adjacent to the recently built concert hall. Last but not least, there have not been any salient changes to the width and length of the balcony but a lounge area has been equipped within this part of the layout.
- Plan A below shows the ground floor of a particular art gallery in 2005 Plan B shows the same area in the present day Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features make some comparisons where relevant 87
- The maps show the village park 10 years ago and the village car park now 77
- The graph shows data about the average Saturday sales of two bakeries in London in 2010 92
- The diagram below shows the stages in the recycling of aluminium drinks cans Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 78
- The chart below shows the process of waste paper recycling 81
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, moreover, so, well, in addition, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 3.97073170732 277% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 912.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03867403315 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95895427415 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.558011049724 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 270.9 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.0699271865 43.030603864 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.285714286 112.824112599 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8571428571 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.42857142857 5.23603664747 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.107476401042 0.215688989381 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0720390600482 0.103423049105 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.122955560805 0.0843802449381 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115846304604 0.15604864568 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.147308957894 0.0819641961636 180% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.2329268293 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.