The charts below show the percentage of food budget the average family spent on restaurant meals in different years. The graph shows the number of meals eaten in fast food restaurants and sit-down restaurants.
The pie charts illustrates how much proportion money spent on restaurant meals and home cooked meals by one family, and the line graph delineates the amount of food ate from fast food and sit down restaurants per year between 1970 and 2000.
overall, it can be manifested that the trend of eating restaurant meals were increased over the time and at last level off with the trend of eating homemade food. while, the fast food gain popularity among the people as time passes.
To commence with, in 1970, the 90%of budget was on household food which was decreased by 5% in next 10 years. after that, the person rose their spending on outside food to 35% in the year 1990. after one decade, the budget in restaurant rose dramatically which became equal to budget on home cooked food.
Secondly, in the initial period, both fast food and sit down restaurant meals were equally popular (20 meals per year) but after 10 years the sit down restaurant food gain some fame and observed rose then initial time by 15 meals per year. However, the fast food come in competition and rose significantly to overtake sit down restaurant meals and hit the peak over 80 meals per annum in 2000, while the sit down restaurant meals also encounter rise but slight to reach nearly 50 meals per year at the end of the time.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-07-14 | sharad patel | 73 | view |
| 2021-06-30 | sharad patel | 87 | view |
| 2020-02-24 | pavel | 63 | view |
| 2017-12-19 | Mela Nguyen | 83 | view |
| 2014-11-28 | nika95 | 92 | view |
- The graph below shows the number of hours per day on average that children spent watching television between 1950 and 2010 78
- The diagram illustrates how bees produce honey 61
- The charts below show the percentage of food budget the average family spent on restaurant meals in different years The graph shows the number of meals eaten in fast food restaurants and sit down restaurants 73
- Some people think that zoos are cruel and should be closed down other however believe that zoos can be useful in protecting wild animals 56
- The graph shows data on the manufacture of passenger cars in 2015
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Overall
...ants per year between 1970 and 2000. overall, it can be manifested that the trend of...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 164, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: While
...with the trend of eating homemade food. while, the fast food gain popularity among th...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 111, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: After
...h was decreased by 5% in next 10 years. after that, the person rose their spending on...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 195, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: After
...n outside food to 35% in the year 1990. after one decade, the budget in restaurant ro...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 137, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ar 20 meals per year but after 10 years the sit down restaurant food gain some fame and...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 399, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... over 80 meals per annum in 2000, while the sit down restaurant meals also encounter ri...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, second, secondly, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1076.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 232.0 196.424390244 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.63793103448 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90276135726 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.30280550602 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.534482758621 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 314.1 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 75.4652237789 43.030603864 175% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.5 112.824112599 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.0 22.9334400587 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.125 5.23603664747 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.468171902653 0.215688989381 217% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.209066174749 0.103423049105 202% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.129676534566 0.0843802449381 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.2880772076 0.15604864568 185% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.117626344678 0.0819641961636 144% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.96 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.2 10.3012195122 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.22 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.32 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.