The government spends about 220 million pounds a year supporting museums and galleries in the UK, and a similar amount subsidizing the visual and performing arts.
This is a huge sum to spend on minority interests, and the money would be better spent on more important things. It should be up to the people who enjoy cultural attractions to pay for them.
What are your views?
It is reported that 220 million pounds is allocated to museums and galleries as well as performing arts in the UK a year. This allocation is biased by people who advocate that those amounts of money should be spent on more pressing issues. On top of that, since almost every art is pondered to be a minor avocation, admirers should make their contributions to those cultural attractions. However, this essay gravitates towards these steps done conducted by governments.
To commence with, maintenance of museums and galleries or investment in art performance would attract more tourists to visit our country, which could be considered as a significant advantage. It is irrefutable that cultural attractions are the most appealing destinations to most tourists visiting a foreign country due to their unique displays and performances as well. To exemplify, it is of note that the volume of tourists visiting cultural organizations makes up a third of 30 million foreign visitors to the UK per year.
Furthermore, investment in sustaining the development of different kinds of arts plays an important role in cultural conservation. To illustrate, museums and galleries long for preserving historical relic containment and govern exhibitions as well. Likewise, many wonderful works of art have been published by theaters. Therefore, promoting and subsidizing the cultural event may arouse public awareness and ease for holding art events, which is of great importance in art preservation.
Nevertheless, there are various issues which governments must cope with, investment in arts, as aforementioned, is indispensable. Attendances in performances or museums could support arts development by buying tickets or work voluntarily for arts organizations.
All in all, these days, cultural attractions which thrive in the modern world could benefit nationalities an awful lot through their profits and contributions to cultural preservation. Therefore, it is necessary for governments and individuals to take actions to ensure that those kinds of arts can be sustained and shared
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-07-14 | viethung123 | 69 | view |
- To some people studying the past has little value in the modern world Why do you think it is important to do so What will the effect if children are not taught history 56
- The diagram below shows the plan of a medical center in 2008 and 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and making comparisons where relevant
- The chart below gives information about different types of waste disposed of in one country in 1960 and 2011 78
- The pie chart shows the online sales for retail sectors in Canada in the year 2005 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and the amount of time spent doing housework in households in one country between 1920 and 2019 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make the com 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 322, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...inds of arts can be sustained and shared
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, likewise, may, nevertheless, therefore, third, well, as well as, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1762.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 317.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.55835962145 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.30042635713 2.80592935109 118% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574132492114 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 542.7 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.5667825221 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.466666667 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1333333333 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.33333333333 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.250899509748 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0855060555201 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0798135336829 0.0667982634062 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131588047887 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0753493709065 0.056905535591 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.26 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.