The table data shows the proportion of income adults and children spent on 4 common items in the United Kingdom in 2005
The table compares the percentage of expenditure for 4 conventional items from income of adults and childrens in UK in 2005
Overall, while food was mostly bought by adults, children spent a majority of their income on music. Also, adults spent less of their whole income on the four items, compared to children
Food was purchased the most by adults, which accounted for a quarter of their income, as opposed to videos (1%). However, children used the least percentage of their income to buy this. In terms of music, they spent most of their money on this item with 39% of their income, whereas the same figure for adults was much lower, at 5%
The expenses of children for electronic equipment was relativly high with 23%, however, this item was reported with the biggest disparity between boys and girls where boys used 18% of their income in contrast to girls who used only 5%. The same figure for men and women was much lower (10% and 1% respectively)
- The line graph below shows the household recycling rates in three different countries Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The chart below shows the percentage of total US population aged 65 and over between 1900 and 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The following diagram shows how rainwater is reused for domestic purposes Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 49
- Many parents today organise extra classes for their children after school and at the weekends Do you feel that this is a worthwhile thing to do or do you feel children have enough education at school 61
- The diagram below shows the process for recycling plastic bottles Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 81
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, so, whereas, while, in contrast, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 790.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 168.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.70238095238 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60020574368 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.34009588539 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.559523809524 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 238.5 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 22.4926829268 147% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 114.878370462 43.030603864 267% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 158.0 112.824112599 140% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.6 22.9334400587 147% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.4 5.23603664747 237% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204205090565 0.215688989381 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.1271901625 0.103423049105 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0984173063456 0.0843802449381 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167751584545 0.15604864568 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0957309217279 0.0819641961636 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 13.2329268293 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.9 61.2550243902 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.57 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.9970731707 138% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.