The chart below shows numbers of incidents and injuries per 100 million passenger miles travelled (PMT) by transportation type in 2002.
The bar chart compares the incidents and injuries caused by 5 different kinds of transportation every 100 million miles commuters travelling in 2002
Overall, in all sorts of trannportation, incidents outnumber injuries. Also,demand response was recorded with the highest number of incidents and injuries, while commuter rail was the least dangerous mode of transportation.
In 2002, passengers found it most dangerous when travelling by demand response, which was witnessed with the biggest gap between 225 incidents and 173 injuries per 100 million miles travelled. In contrast, the safest vehicle at that time was commuter rail when there were only 20 incidents and 17 injuries reported, which were 10 times lower than those of demand response
As far as bus, heavy and light rail are concerned, there was a same number of incidents caused by bus and light rail, which was 76. However, the injuries recorded between these vehicles were far different when the figure for bus ( 66 injuries ) nearly doubled the other one with 39 injuries. Finally, heavy rail was reported with 51 incidents and 35 incidents per 100 million passenger miles travelled
- It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environment such as South pole Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 78
- The diagram below shows the process for recycling plastic bottles Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant The diagram illustrates how plastic bottles are recycled Overall the recycling of 90
- Many people believe that it is easier to have a healthy lifestyle in the countryside Others believe that there are health benefits of living in the cities Discuss both views and give your own opinions 56
- Whether or not someone achieves their aims is mostly by a question of luck To what extent do you agree or disagree 80
- Village of Chorleywood showing development between 1868 and 1994 Chorleywood is a village near London whose population has increased steadily since the middle of the nineteenth century The map shows the development of the village 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 76, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , demand
...tion, incidents outnumber injuries. Also,demand response was recorded with the highest ...
^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...es lower than those of demand response As far as bus, heavy and light rail are ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 229, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...re far different when the figure for bus 66 injuries nearly doubled the other on...
^^
Line 7, column 242, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ent when the figure for bus 66 injuries nearly doubled the other one with 39 inj...
^^
Line 7, column 400, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...er 100 million passenger miles travelled
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, however, if, so, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 33.7804878049 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 976.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.33333333333 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79728051604 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579234972678 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 280.8 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 65.4966072064 43.030603864 152% => OK
Chars per sentence: 162.666666667 112.824112599 144% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.5 22.9334400587 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.33333333333 5.23603664747 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.311378633894 0.215688989381 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.189105135433 0.103423049105 183% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.129268964305 0.0843802449381 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.220637213174 0.15604864568 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.114306432676 0.0819641961636 139% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.9 13.2329268293 143% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.49 61.2550243902 81% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.23 11.4140731707 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.