Technology has made it easier for people to communicate with each other. Some people prefer to talk over the phone. While others prefer to text messages. Which type of communication do you prefer and why?
In this fast pace world, the technology develops with a rocketing speed leading to many form of communication. Most of attractive types of conversation is texting and directly speaking through the electronic device. In my view, the simulation of face-to-face talking has many potential benefits which I will explain it for several reasons.
To begin with, talking over the phone supports people with clearly and adequatly conversation. When some imperative problems cannot be converted through messages because it limited the ability of language result in misunderstanding for the listener. Therefore, calling is a reasonable solution for this since the talker is able to understand the situation which helps them convenient in giving their viewpoint. Furthermore, texting has to use hand to type which means that it has to be recover when a mistake occurred in order to avoid the misconception leading to some of the information are miss.
In the other perspective, telephone calls help the conversation become more successful and valuable as same as face-to-face conversation. Sending the message is deliver a lecture that cannot contain any feeling and emotion which means it only the deception meaning. Thus, talking will fluently convey your feelings result in the delight of communicating. The business field is a compelling example of this idea. In order to persuade the customer, texting is not able to let them understand the value of products. Hence, the simulation of traditional talking by the phone can help the customer to touch their thinking.
In conclusion, talking over the phone has many advantages for the user.
- An American film actor once said Tomorrow is important and precious Some people think individuals and society should pay more attention to the future than to the present Do you agree or disagree 78
- the two pie charts below show the online shopping sales for retail sectors in canada in 2005 and 2010
- The maps give information about a university sports court 73
- The diagram below shows the various stages involved in the production of beer 84
- The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework and households in one country between 1920 and 2019 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 84, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun form seems to be countable; consider using: 'many forms'.
Suggestion: many forms
...elops with a rocketing speed leading to many form of communication. Most of attractive ty...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 566, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...r to avoid the misconception leading to some of the information are miss. In the other p...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 162, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'delivered'.
Suggestion: delivered
...ce conversation. Sending the message is deliver a lecture that cannot contain any feeli...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, hence, so, therefore, thus, as to, in conclusion, in my view, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 13.8261648746 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 43.0788530466 37% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 52.1666666667 79% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1383.0 1977.66487455 70% => OK
No of words: 258.0 407.700716846 63% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36046511628 4.8611393121 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.48103885553 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05477753123 2.67179642975 114% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 212.727598566 71% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.581395348837 0.524837075471 111% => OK
syllable_count: 432.0 618.680645161 70% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 9.59856630824 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.3295107178 48.9658058833 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.7857142857 100.406767564 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4285714286 20.6045352989 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.28571428571 5.45110844103 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201468003602 0.236089414692 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0625417384003 0.076458572812 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0481170257035 0.0737576698707 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122754320452 0.150856017488 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0365563905717 0.0645574589148 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 58.1214874552 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 10.9000537634 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 86.8835125448 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
More content wanted.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.