Some people think that strict punishments for driving offences are the key to reducing traffic accidents. Others, howerver, believe that other measures would be more effective in improving road safety. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Harsh castigations are believed to be the most efficient methods to diminish serious traffic collisions. Meanwhile, other people claim that government could apply other strategies to enhance the road safety. For me, people should flexibly combine different measures to simultaneously reduce the traffic accidents and ensure the safety to traffic participants.
On the one hand, there is an undeniable fact that many traffic shunts root from careless drivers’ faults. It is obvious that stricter chastisements could strongly impact on people’s psychology. As a result, the authorities would be able to force citizens to follow the traffic rules more carefully, and the road safety could consequently be promoted. For example, there are many accident cases in Vietnam resulting from the drivers’ ancohol consumption. By drastically raising the fine, Vietnam’s traffic condition experienced the considerable decrease of collisions in a long time period. Clearly, rigorous punishments are capable of making a great impact on people’s consciousness, thus enhance the traffic safety effectively.
On the other hand, there is no denying the fact that many other methods could be applied in order to lessen accident cases and promote the safety to inhabitants. In many countries, especially the developing nations, the transport infrastructures are currently in poor conditions. Therefore, one of many effective solutions for the accidents’ decrease would be the immediate improvement of traffic facilities. Additionally, people should also be encouraged to used public transportations instead of their private vehicles. Consequently, this method would totally lead to the increase of road safety and the better environment would also be a favourable side result.
In conslusion, from my personal perspective, I firmly believe that each solution has its advantage and disadvantage, so people should carefully combine them in order to effectively reduce the accidents and ensure the road safety.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-07-18 | XuanHung03 | 73 | view |
| 2021-07-18 | XuanHung03 | 73 | view |
- Some people think that strict punishments for driving offences are the key to reducing traffic accidents Others howerver believe that other measures would be more effective in improving road safety Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- There are more and more parents working full time Some people argue the childcare centres are the best in taking care of young children Others think grandparents are better carers Discuss both view and give your opinion 61
- Almost more and more people read news on the Internet newspapers will remain the most important source of news Do you agree or disagree 78
- The chart below shows the waste collection by a recycling centre from 2011 to 2015 78
- Some people think that strict punishments for driving offences are the key to reducing traffic accidents Others howerver believe that other measures would be more effective in improving road safety Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, if, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1709.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.79322033898 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20532449874 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572881355932 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 532.8 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.6124315627 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.933333333 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6666666667 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.325625004029 0.244688304435 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102683257169 0.084324248473 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0666442604964 0.0667982634062 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.198469244186 0.151304729494 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0624698280069 0.056905535591 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.3 12.4159519038 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.88 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, if, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1709.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.79322033898 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20532449874 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572881355932 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 532.8 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.6124315627 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.933333333 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6666666667 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.325625004029 0.244688304435 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102683257169 0.084324248473 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0666442604964 0.0667982634062 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.198469244186 0.151304729494 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0624698280069 0.056905535591 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.3 12.4159519038 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.88 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.