Although innovations such as video, computers, and the Internet seem to offer schools improved methods for instructing students, these technologies all too often distract from real learning.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
The statement mentions that technology like internet and videos can distract students from learning. Every student has a choice to use it for learning or for entertainment. Thus, schools can have regulation programs to control the technology distraction.
First of all, we definitely cannot ignore the numerous positive learning consequences by using technology. Imagine a country, Iran, where there was not internet to help students to understand textbook contents better. Consider how much easier it could be for students to study with innovations like teaching websites and not just textbooks. Technology can bring an opportunity for teachers to teach their concepts better and deeper to students.
Additionally, depending on the concept everybody can study better and faster by using different modernization methods. For example, it is easier for some students to understand textbooks’ concepts by reading different articles, research papers, online books, and online flash cards, but some students are more comfortable to learn with watching videos and movies, and seeing pictures. No matter what is the teaching concept and how students are able to learn, innovations like Internet and computes have brought a lot of ways for teachers to teach more efficient and for students to learn deeper.
However, some teachers and parents believe that unlimited use of Internet can be a distraction in schools. Obviously, students who spend a lot of their time playing video games, checking their Facebook, and chatting online cannot focus on their studying; however, we cannot blame the technology. There are always two sides of technology which can be positive or negative. Students who choose to use those technologies for studying purpose are able to learn. On the other hand, students who use an internet for entertainment can slow down their learning time. In addition, schools can easily install especial programs to filter video games, websites, and Facebook.
Students should use innovations like Internet and videos which can definitely improve and bring unlimited teaching and learning techniques. Surely students can get extra help from different online websites to learn deeper. In case of distraction, schools can have regulation programs to guide and monitor students.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-28 | qsdzlbnwtpzecdeugi | 33 | view |
| 2024-02-19 | Zahid6400 | 75 | view |
| 2024-01-19 | rimpiG | 54 | view |
| 2023-11-09 | Feiyang Wang | 79 | view |
| 2023-08-05 | weonalaz | 58 | view |
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and supporti 50
- Teachers salaries should be based on their students academic performance Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your position be sure to address the most compelling reaso 50
- The vice president of human resources at Climpson Industries sent the following recommendation to the company s president A recent national survey found that the majority of workers with access to the Internet at work had used company computers for person 50
- A recently issued twenty year study on headaches suffered by the residents of Mentia investigated the possible therapeutic effect of consuming salicylates Salicylates are members of the same chemical family as aspirin a medicine used to treat headaches Al 57
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and supporti 50
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, so, thus, for example, in addition, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 19.5258426966 51% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 33.0505617978 39% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 58.6224719101 70% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1938.0 2235.4752809 87% => OK
No of words: 350.0 442.535393258 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.53714285714 5.05705443957 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32530772707 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82917165349 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 215.323595506 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.502857142857 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 585.0 704.065955056 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 49.2863755454 60.3974514979 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.0 118.986275619 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4210526316 23.4991977007 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.84210526316 5.21951772744 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223326735489 0.243740707755 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0837931197304 0.0831039109588 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0526764745279 0.0758088955206 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153121930703 0.150359130593 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0343367992222 0.0667264976115 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 14.1392134831 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.85 12.1639044944 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 100.480337079 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, so, thus, for example, in addition, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 19.5258426966 51% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 33.0505617978 39% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 58.6224719101 70% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1938.0 2235.4752809 87% => OK
No of words: 350.0 442.535393258 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.53714285714 5.05705443957 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32530772707 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82917165349 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 215.323595506 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.502857142857 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 585.0 704.065955056 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 49.2863755454 60.3974514979 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.0 118.986275619 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4210526316 23.4991977007 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.84210526316 5.21951772744 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223326735489 0.243740707755 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0837931197304 0.0831039109588 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0526764745279 0.0758088955206 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153121930703 0.150359130593 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0343367992222 0.0667264976115 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 14.1392134831 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.85 12.1639044944 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 100.480337079 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.