The chart below gives information about the number of social networking sites people used in Canada in 2014 and 2015.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart below illustrates the popularity of different social media in the years 2014 and 2015 in Canada.
Overall, the data indicates that the number of websites Canadian used experienced à same trend in both years. It is noticeable that most people using only one site to contact others.
The number of people in Canada who use no social networking sites was about 22% in 2014; then rose significantly to 36 percent of people who are using only one social site in the same year. Meanwhile, the number of people using more than one social site leveled off and began to go down at 12% people using three sites; and only 2% people using five social networking sites in 2014.
On the other hand; the number of people using different social networking sites in 2015 showed the same trend. There was a significant rise between the number of people who use no social networking sites and people who use only one site. Then, there were 8% people using 4 sites, compared to that in the year 2014. The number of people using more than 4 sites
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-12-13 | phoenix lee | 78 | view |
| 2021-07-20 | just_maianh | 67 | view |
- Some people seek a lot of advice from family and friends when choosing their career Others feel it is better to choose a career more independently Discuss both views and give your opinion Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from 56
- Some people think that parents should teach children how to be good members of the society Others however believe that school is the place to learn this Discuss both views and give your opinion 67
- m 75
- The chart below shows the places visited by different people living in Australia 73
- Some feel that cities should be designed to be beautiful while others feel their functionality is more important Discuss both sides and give your own opinion 89
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 360, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...number of people using more than 4 sites
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, then, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 865.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.6256684492 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.26371917213 2.65546596893 85% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.491978609626 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 271.8 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.1498792269 43.030603864 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.1111111111 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7777777778 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.22222222222 5.23603664747 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.348247204445 0.215688989381 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.18891744988 0.103423049105 183% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0692677189952 0.0843802449381 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.235061554355 0.15604864568 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0787514387777 0.0819641961636 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.57 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.91 8.06136585366 86% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 360, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...number of people using more than 4 sites
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, then, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 865.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.6256684492 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.26371917213 2.65546596893 85% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.491978609626 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 271.8 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.1498792269 43.030603864 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.1111111111 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7777777778 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.22222222222 5.23603664747 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.348247204445 0.215688989381 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.18891744988 0.103423049105 183% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0692677189952 0.0843802449381 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.235061554355 0.15604864568 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0787514387777 0.0819641961636 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.57 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.91 8.06136585366 86% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.