The effectiveness of a country's leaders is best measured by examining the well-being of that country's citizens.
Throughout the history, societies have recklessly struggled for enhancing the well-beings of people in order to sustain a territorial regime. Especially when it comes to the politics of a state, it is the main responsibility of the government to take care of the public's physical and mental health. The statement underscores this duty of providing basic needs of lives as a standard of an effectual governing. However, even though my thesis holds a general support on the statement, it is necessary to take consideration of the political, cultural, and economical aspects that are impossible to be handled by a single leader. This essay claims on the circumstances in which the capability of the citizens, the overall infrastructure of the country, and the international relationship in a given state are factors that mostly determine the well-beings of the country.
While the country leader is responsible for managing the current conditions of life among the public, a state of well-being of the citizens is determined and evaluated in terms of their ideological, cultural and religious beliefs. For example, in India in which the realm of Hinduism takes place in most areas, well-being is conceptualized in terms of balancing the maintaining of living and the feeling of being connected with the divine. Even though the basic needs are not enough fulfilled, as long as well-being is a subjective state, citizens might be satisfied by the fact that their religious patterns. On the other hand, developed countries such as the nations of northern Europe shall indicate a low satisfaction in their well being notwithstanding the fact that most citizens are being supported for their financial needs. That is, various factors are intertwined that defines the overall satisfaction of the citizens.
Second, the infrastructural basis of the country is a product that has been accumulated throughout a long period of time. Especially in the current phase of global warming and climate change, the country’s leader shall not have the capacity of supplying the immediate needs when faced by natural disasters. For instance, as the summer of 2020 reached above 40 degrees Celsius in the European continents, several countries had to undergo severe hardships because of their lack of air conditional advices in residential areas. In that case, calling for a full responsibility to the current political leader might be somewhat merciless because such infrastructure cannot be implemented in one day.
The current international relationship of the country is another factor that affects the living conditions of the public. In a current state of globalization, either collective or individual practices held by neighboring countries render significant impacts on the behaviors multinational corporates, which in turn results to a fluctuation in the economics. Thus, a country’s well-being shall be meticulously predicted in terms of the diplomatic status of the nation. For example, the financial crisis that South Korea had undergone during the mid-90s, it is said that the main culprit of the crisis was not due to the failure of the domestic measures but instead due to the oppression applied by the international monetary fund. Citizens attributed their hardship of living to the heavy dependance of overseas corporates, so that cooperation among the public seemed to be raised that centered upon the government. Likewise, circumstances in which economical hardship is closely linked to the international politics, the effectiveness of a political leader may increment despite the impaired living conditions.
In conclusion, this essay has discussed three key factors that influence the fidelity to a country and the country’s leader, and has argued that it is an important consideration for evaluating the well being of a country. When the cultural, ideological beliefs, the infrastructural basis, and the international relationships are in good terms, satisfaction in living conditions throughout the country might have no direct relevance to the ability of the country’s leader. It is therefore recommended that the effectiveness of a country’s leader be evaluated in consideration of the affiliated factors
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2024-04-16 | Zahid6400 | 50 | view |
2023-09-18 | Winner | 66 | view |
2023-07-21 | PS5 | 75 | view |
2023-02-08 | abhikhanna | 66 | view |
2023-01-02 | abhikhanna | 62 | view |
- Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future 75
- Claim When planning courses educators should take into account the interests and suggestions of their students Reason Students are more motivated to learn when they are interested in what they are studying 83
- Claim Researchers should not limit their investigations to only those areas in which they expect to discover something that has an immediate practical application Reason It is impossible to predict the outcome of a line of research with any certainty 83
- As we acquire more knowledge things do not become more comprehensible but more complex and mysterious 66
- As we acquire more knowledge things do not become more comprehensible but more complex and mysterious 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 108, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
... has been accumulated throughout a long period of time. Especially in the current phase of glo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, likewise, may, second, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 36.0 19.5258426966 184% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 23.0 11.3162921348 203% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 32.0 33.0505617978 97% => OK
Preposition: 99.0 58.6224719101 169% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 12.9106741573 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3568.0 2235.4752809 160% => OK
No of words: 653.0 442.535393258 148% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.46401225115 5.05705443957 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.05508305356 4.55969084622 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.28291565279 2.79657885939 117% => OK
Unique words: 304.0 215.323595506 141% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.465543644717 0.4932671777 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 1109.7 704.065955056 158% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.99550561798 200% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 23.0359550562 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 49.5954522581 60.3974514979 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 155.130434783 118.986275619 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.3913043478 23.4991977007 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.21739130435 5.21951772744 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.381991797465 0.243740707755 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114666624504 0.0831039109588 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0860572347912 0.0758088955206 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.230538011546 0.150359130593 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0906428966384 0.0667264976115 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.5 14.1392134831 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.6 48.8420337079 71% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 12.1743820225 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.1639044944 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.64 8.38706741573 115% => OK
difficult_words: 191.0 100.480337079 190% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.8971910112 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 11.2143820225 118% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.