In many nations, it is evident that there is an increasing disinterest in science subjects. This essay discusses some remarkable reasons and their impacts regarding this alarming rate.
There are two chief factors responsible for selecting other specialties instead of studying science. Firstly, it is because science topics seem to be monotonous and stressful for many learners not talented in it. When research this subject, people have to concentrate intensively on numbers, data, spend a huge amount of time reading tough documents relating to physics, chemistry, biology, and other natural science papers to attain impressive performance. Besides, it highly requires tough skills including observation, analysis, explanation, prediction, and presentation. Another reason for this trend is that job opportunities in this field are not appealing. University graduates are often enraptured by well-paid jobs related to economics, finance. Whereas pursuing science needs more exertion, industrious skills honing, and serious study toward achievement, but the income is not attractive.
Some fundamental consequences could be anticipated if this issue continues. Firstly, an unbalanced workforce could become a severe problem for society. For example, we could witness growth in the jobless rate if there are too many graduates from economics schools, while the amount of employees in science is inadequate. This creates a burden imposed on the government as it would be immoderate for the authority to subsidize unemployment. Secondly, the technology of that country would deteriorate since there are few inventions, no application of cutting-edge technology into the economy as well as social life, which could hold back the economy from development.
In conclusion, the decline in people learning science stems from the tediousness, pressure as well as lack of development chances on this side. This problem can lead to detrimental effects upon society and the economy.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-07-21 | myhuyenueh94 | 56 | view |
- The tradition that the family gets together to eat meals is disappearing What are the reasons What are the impacts 61
- Nowadays many families have both parents working Some working parents believe other family members like grandparents can take care of their children while others think childcare centers provide the best care Discuss both views and give your own opinion 73
- Some people think that pp should choose their job based on income in order to provide security for their family Do you think money is an important factor when choosing a job What other factors should be considered 73
- Some people think that pp should choose their job based on income in order to provide security for their family Do you think money is an important factor when choosing a job What other factors should be considered 73
- The tradition that the family gets together to eat meals is disappearing What are the reasons What are the impacts 61
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, well, whereas, while, for example, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1526.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 265.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.75849056604 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08588352167 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.667924528302 0.561755894193 119% => OK
syllable_count: 477.0 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.9680533735 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.0 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9285714286 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.28571428571 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.38176352705 68% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184247237006 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0600735822614 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.052238109354 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119449216155 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00960263646491 0.056905535591 17% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.13 12.4159519038 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.25 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, well, whereas, while, for example, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1526.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 265.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.75849056604 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08588352167 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.667924528302 0.561755894193 119% => OK
syllable_count: 477.0 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.9680533735 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.0 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9285714286 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.28571428571 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.38176352705 68% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184247237006 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0600735822614 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.052238109354 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119449216155 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00960263646491 0.056905535591 17% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.13 12.4159519038 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.25 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.