Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In twenty years there will be fewer are in use than there are today. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
In this new modern era, by advancement of technology, transportation has become as one of inevitable human demanding. People have to go to work by cars, urban buses, subways, even airplanes. These severe requirement for movement, make a huge demand for vehicles. Today, one of the main challenges in urban management is the aggregation of these vehicles. In metropolises this matter is more challenging. So, the managers in such cities make some new plans to decrease the number of vehicle, for example they decide to expand bicycle usage or underground transportation like subway. Although in some regions they achieved part of their goals, these plans thoroughly being defeated. Despite these failed programs, some people and scientist believe that reducing the cars is inevitable matter, and in future the cars' population will be fewer than today. However, some others do not believe this view, and state that the number of vehicles will not decrease. I personally contend that the latter is more realistic. In the following paragraphs, I will delve into the most outstanding reasons.
The first exquisite point to be mentioned is that people feel more comfort in their own car. So, they prefer to move by their own car rather than public transportation. This matter causes more demanding for cars. Moreover, people feel safer in their own car. In an own car, a person is less under the danger of crushing, and less exposed to contagious diseases. For example, in the latest new epidemic, Covid 19, people who use public transportation like subway, taxi or buss become infected more than others.
Another reason which deserves some words here is that car producing is a profitable industry in the whole world. There is a great profit in this industry both for factory owners and governments. So, they prefer to produce more cars and sell it quickly than constructing a metro line by spending millions of Dollars. Governments earn more income by taking taxes from car owners and factories. As a result, in spite of governments' nice slogans about environmental issues, truly they think about their benefits.
In conclusion, I think although decreasing the car populations in the future is a good idea, it will be remain as a dream in this new modern period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-07-21 | ali.hasani1992 | 70 | view |
- TPO 04 Integrated Writing Task Endotherms are animals such as modern birds and mammals that keep their body temperatures constant 70
- TPO 27 integrated writing task 45
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Life today is easier and more comfortable than it was when your grandparents were children Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 75
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Successful people try new things and take risks rather than only doing what they know how to do well Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, moreover, so, for example, i think, in conclusion, as a result, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 43.0788530466 70% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 52.1666666667 90% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1896.0 1977.66487455 96% => OK
No of words: 374.0 407.700716846 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06951871658 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3976220399 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80451077323 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 212.727598566 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55614973262 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 592.2 618.680645161 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.7564404809 48.9658058833 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.4347826087 100.406767564 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2608695652 20.6045352989 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.95652173913 5.45110844103 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0978536038491 0.236089414692 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0261054629718 0.076458572812 34% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0325462760602 0.0737576698707 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0560637407728 0.150856017488 37% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0266519039936 0.0645574589148 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 11.7677419355 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 58.1214874552 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.83 10.9000537634 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.01818996416 112% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 86.8835125448 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.