The graph below shows the consumption of 3 spreads from 1981 to 2007
The daily consumption of margarine, low fat and reduced spreads, butter is compared in the given graph from 1981 to 2007. Units are measured in grams.
Overall, it is evident that the consumption for margarine and butter saw a downward trend over the period, while there was an upward trend in use of low fat and reduced spreads. People consumed butter with higher amount than other spreads in the beginning of the period, but in the last of the period, the most preferred spread was low fat and reduced spreads, whereas, they had been in use from 1996.
Looking into details, as is observed, in 1981, daily consumption of butter was around 140 grams and that of margarine was under 100 grams. Then the amount of consumed butter had experienced a dramatic decline by intersecting with margarine at 100 grams, in the meantime margarine had increased by about 10 grams. After 5 years, when people started to consume low fat and reduced spreads, the consumption of margarine stood steadily at 100 grams, while the amount of butter consumption declined to 70 grams. Then both of spreads had witnessed a decrease to 40 grams (margarine), around 50 grams (butter).
Turning to the third spread, it could not be consumed over 26 years. Although it introduced in 1996, it had a significant increase in use with over 80 grams per a person. In the end of the period, the figure of low fat and reduced spreads dropped to 70 grams, however it became the most consumed spread.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-01 | Kate Allen | 73 | view |
- The line graphs below show the production and demand for steel in million tones in the steel industry in the UK in 2010 61
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities 73
- The pie charts below show the most common advantages and disadvantages of Fairmont Island according to a survey of visitors Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 72
- The chart below shows the places visited by different people living in Australia
- The graph below shows the consumption of 3 spreads from 1981 to 2007 82
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 33, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...er. Turning to the third spread, it couldnt be consumed over 26 years. Although it ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, look, so, then, third, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1213.0 965.302439024 126% => OK
No of words: 254.0 196.424390244 129% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77559055118 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53965084208 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.48031496063 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 347.4 283.868780488 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 1.07073170732 560% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.2615120201 43.030603864 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.272727273 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0909090909 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170303318852 0.215688989381 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0755606109203 0.103423049105 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0848128019686 0.0843802449381 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13565242224 0.15604864568 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0848452043796 0.0819641961636 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.74 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.26 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.4329268293 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.