Salton sea's salinity.
Both the reading and lecture discuss about the salinity of Salton Sea which is a salty inland lake. The former argues that the increased level of salinity over the years will make the lake unable to support fish and bird populations. Then, the author suggests three ways to reserve the threatening trend but the lecturer contradicts each of those points.
Firstly, the author asserts that desalination would be a great way to directly remove the salt from lake. However, the lecturer disputes the arguments by explaining that solid materials (such as salt and other dissolved materials in the lake) that would be left behind, pose a serious health issues for people as some chemicals are toxic. Additionally, she points out that, when people breath in these toxic chemicals by change, they will be sick.
Secondly, the author claims that the salt level of lake water could be diluted with the Pacific Ocean water which is 20 percent less salty than the lake water. In contrast, the lecturer contends that constructing pipelines and canals for over 100 km will be expensive for the local government. Moreover, she states that the local government may not bee willing to spend their funds on this costly project.
Finally. the author insists that the lake could be divided into several sections by constructing walls, where salinity of smaller sections would allow to increase and the main and largest section's salinity would be reduced and controlled by directing all fresh water from small rivers. The lecturer, however, contests that constructing walls would be a temporary solution as the region is frequent with geological activities such as earthquack. Furthermore, she notes that the constructed wall would fall and the water from sections would mix back in.
To sum up, the author and the lecturer both hold different view of the topic. It will be difficult to find a common ground for the issue.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-05 | nusybah | 85 | view |
| 2023-07-24 | YasamanEsml | 90 | view |
| 2023-07-24 | YasamanEsml | 85 | view |
| 2023-07-20 | Take | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-20 | Take | 90 | view |
- Native to Europe and Asia cheatgrass is an invasive species of grass that is causing problems in North American fields The plant quickly dominates fields that it has invaded and drives out other plants This can cause among other problems severe damage to 85
- The following appeared in a memorandum from the planning department of an electric power company Several recent surveys indicate that home owners are increasingly eager to conserve energy At the same time manufacturers are now marketing many home applianc 60
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government industry or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation not competition 62
- A recent study reveals that people especially young people are reading far less literature novels plays and poems than they used to This is troubling because the trend has unfortunate effects for the reading public for culture in general and for the futur 76
- genetic modification 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Finally,
... their funds on this costly project. Finally. the author insists that the lake could...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 10, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...nds on this costly project. Finally. the author insists that the lake could be d...
^^^
Line 7, column 152, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'increasing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'allow' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: increasing
...alinity of smaller sections would allow to increase and the main and largest sections salin...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, in contrast, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 5.04856512141 277% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 30.3222958057 112% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1597.0 1373.03311258 116% => OK
No of words: 316.0 270.72406181 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05379746835 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52518757007 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 145.348785872 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572784810127 0.540411800872 106% => OK
syllable_count: 467.1 419.366225166 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.8746775547 49.2860985944 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.071428571 110.228320801 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5714285714 21.698381199 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.28571428571 7.06452816374 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.104423716405 0.272083759551 38% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0401029287814 0.0996497079465 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0994356153637 0.0662205650399 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0620726868124 0.162205337803 38% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0970127887027 0.0443174109184 219% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.3589403974 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 53.8541721854 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 12.2367328918 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 63.6247240618 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.