jkdsaldisadehccxzza
My thoughts don't align with the given statement. I disagree that understanding the past is of little use to people who hold current positions of leadership.
One of the most important moral values that children are imbibed with is that one must always learn from his/her mistakes. Retrospection is a very crucial part of the development and growth of a person, irrespective of the age or the position that the person holds. Be it failures or successes: looking back at them, analyzing them, recognizing where we went wrong, indentifying areas for improvement as well as being aware of our strengths and weaknesses - all of this will surely help us know where we stand as a person in our field of work, if we are a liability or an asset, and how we can contribute more to the work we do.
Furthermore, being in the position of a leader in any field, be it politics or business or industrial workspace, requires a lot of courage, tenacity, determination and hard work to carry out the responsibilities. And leaders keep changing; when that happens, it is highly important for the leader in current position to keep track of the past, to be well informed about the tenure of the several, previous leaders in the same role, and learn from the mistakes that they might have committed. By retrospecting on their own actions as well as understanding the past, the leaders can increase their working efficiency and produce more fruitful results. The sole purpose of being a leader in any field is to bring about changes that can prove to be advantageous for the people as well as the environment in which they operate in.
Let us consider an hypothetical example of a software company which is looking to make someone the next leader for their firm. The previous leader completed his tenure and did whatever he could during his period of leading. Now, if a candidate who's applied for the position of leadership has a thorough understanding of the past in terms of working efficiency, workplace ethics and environment, and the minor or major mishaps in the past, he would make a really good leader if he works on his findings from the past and yearns to bring about the required changes and assure more successes. In yet another example, if we take a democratic nation and their leaders, the citizens of the nation would surely expect more from the current leader as compared to the previous leaders. Well apprised leaders of the current ruling party must have a clear understanding of the past - knowledge of the statistics & patterns of the nation in terms of law, all the bills and rules that have been passed, about the educational conditions and international relations, and so many other aspects of ruling a nation will be a confidence boost for the leader too and he/she will be able to work with more alacrity and zealousness than ever before.
Therefore, understanding the past is very important for people in current positions of leadership.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-07-31 | jaded_monkey | 16 | view |
- jkdsaldisadehccxzza 16
- lmao 68
- The following appeared in a memorandum from the owner of Movies Galore a chain of movie rental stores In order to stop the recent decline in our profits we must reduce operating expenses at Movies Galore s ten movie rental stores Since we are famous for o 58
- The following is an excerpt from a speech given to the School Board about a change to the curriculum Because the future will be dominated by technology we must make four years of computer programming mandatory for all high school students If our students 71
- Some people believe that corporations have a responsibility to promote the well being of the societies and environments in which they operate Others believe that the only responsibility of corporations provided they operate within the law is to make as mu 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 13, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
My thoughts dont align with the given statement. I disag...
^^^^
Line 1, column 102, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...hat understanding the past is of little use to people who hold current positions of...
^^^
Line 7, column 17, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...ch they operate in. Let us consider an hypothetical example of a software comp...
^^
Line 7, column 245, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: who's
... period of leading. Now, if a candidate whos applied for the position of leadership ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, look, really, so, therefore, well, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 25.0 14.8657303371 168% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 33.0505617978 127% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 77.0 58.6224719101 131% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2446.0 2235.4752809 109% => OK
No of words: 506.0 442.535393258 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83399209486 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.7428307748 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85229638355 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 245.0 215.323595506 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.48418972332 0.4932671777 98% => OK
syllable_count: 756.9 704.065955056 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 23.0359550562 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 113.248674263 60.3974514979 188% => OK
Chars per sentence: 163.066666667 118.986275619 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.7333333333 23.4991977007 144% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.21951772744 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.243740707755 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0831039109588 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0758088955206 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.150359130593 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0667264976115 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.2 14.1392134831 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.44 48.8420337079 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 12.1743820225 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.33 12.1639044944 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 100.480337079 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 11.2143820225 136% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.