The table below shows the number of vehicles registered in Australia in 2010, 2012 and 2014.
The table illustrates how many vehicles in different modes of transportation ran in Australia in three years 2010, 2012 and 2014.
As can be seen from the table, the number of passenger vehicles was recorded to be the highest in all surveyed years while that of light trucks was the lowest. Moreover, motorcycles showed the biggest increase in the percentage.
In particular, there were 11 million vehicles for passengers in 2010, which was 5 times greater than the figure for commercial vehicles. The next years 2012 and 2014 both witnessed a quite similar pattern in those categories, in which the number rose by 18.22% for the former and 12.4% for the latter. Meanwhile, there were only 106.000 and 131.000 light trucks driven in Australia as the lowest and the highest figure of its own survey, making this the last place.
Interestingly, the percentage change in the number of light trucks was fairly high, at 23.5 %. It was the motorcycles that had the biggest shift, of 30.7%, which was 3 times as high as that of heavy trucks.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-08 | tranhonghanh11 | 79 | view |
| 2023-05-19 | letrang250191 | 78 | view |
| 2023-05-06 | letrang250191 | 78 | view |
| 2023-04-20 | ngtlinh | 78 | view |
| 2023-03-06 | letrang250191 | 84 | view |
- Some people say that the main environmental problem of our time is the loss of particular species of plants and animals Others said that there are more important environmental problems Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- The picture below shows how a hot balloon works 73
- The first chart below gives information about the money spent by British parents on their children s sports between 2008 and 2014 The second chart shows the number of children who participated in three sports in Britain over the same time period 78
- The maps below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today 84
- The chart below shows waste collection by a recycling centre from 2011 to 2015 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, while, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 862.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 177.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87005649718 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61232934621 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587570621469 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 237.6 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.7719392163 43.030603864 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.75 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.125 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.25 5.23603664747 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22446971277 0.215688989381 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.093399778556 0.103423049105 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0946196017391 0.0843802449381 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147122381999 0.15604864568 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.111747916159 0.0819641961636 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.