If a goal is worthy, then any means taken to attain it are justifiable.
[Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.]
The speaker asserts that as long as the goal is worthy, stopping at nothing to achieve the goal is reasonable. Indeed, stopping at nothing to attain a purpose can help us fulfill some purposes. However, if any means taken to achieve the goal remain extreme, it causes a negative influence on society and individuals. In my point of view, I strongly disagree with the speaker. There are three different fields, including economic, political, and entertainment areas, that can reflect the negative effect after doing a means taken to attain a goal.
To begin with, in the realm of the economy, any means taken to attain a goal will cause an economic recession. Although companies want to earn more profit, a worthy goal for them, if they stop at nothing to get what they want, they will cause social conflicts and economic disorder. Unfair competition can be an example. Since unfair competition causes economic injury to a business through deceptive or wrong business practices, it will lead to economic disorder. In sum, even though the goal is worthy, stopping at nothing to get it will harm the economy.
Secondly, in the political area, stopping at nothing to get the goal will induce political disorder, even though the goal is worthy. To many politicians, becoming a president is their final goal. However, when they stop at nothing to be a president, they will cause social disorder. Africa conflict is an example. For their interest, Africa’s leaders launch many wars in Africa without minding victims. In a word, in the political area, if leaders stop at nothing to achieve the goal, it will lead to social disorder.
Finally, in the entertainment field, any means taken to attain a goal will result in unfair competition, even if the goal is worthy. It is reasonable that the actors want to be well-known. However, if they stop at nothing to obtain the goal, it may cause improper things for them. Unspoken rules in Korea can be an illustration. To be famous, many actresses stop at nothing to achieve their goal. In addition, to get an opportunity for plays, they must sleep with the director without choice. As a result, many actresses commit suicide, since such an insult is unbearable. In brief, if people stop at nothing to achieve the goal, it is necessary to happen some improper things, even impairing themselves.
To sum up, in the economic, political, and entertainment field, stopping at nothing to attain a goal will make society and individuals injury. Therefore, I disagree with what the speaker says.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-31 | ekarumeblessing@icloud.com | 79 | view |
| 2024-10-29 | batterylow_123 | 58 | view |
| 2024-10-27 | batterylow_123 | 66 | view |
| 2024-10-26 | batterylow_123 | 66 | view |
| 2024-10-26 | batterylow_123 | 66 | view |
- The following memorandum is from the business manager of Happy Pancake House restaurants Butter has now been replaced by margarine in Happy Pancake House restaurants throughout the southwestern United States Only about 2 percent of customers have complain 60
- If a goal is worthy then any means taken to attain it are justifiable Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and supporting your 50
- It is primarily through our identification with social groups that we define ourselves Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing an 58
- People s behavior is largely determined by forces not of their own making 58
- The effectiveness of a country s leaders is best measured by examining the well being of that country s citizens Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your position be s 66
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, in addition, in brief, as a result, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 14.8657303371 40% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.3162921348 35% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 58.6224719101 109% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2115.0 2235.4752809 95% => OK
No of words: 426.0 442.535393258 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96478873239 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54310108192 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71426576501 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 215.323595506 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.422535211268 0.4932671777 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 654.3 704.065955056 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 6.24550561798 192% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 13.0 3.10617977528 419% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 17.0 4.38483146067 388% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.2370786517 128% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.6637186015 60.3974514979 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.3461538462 118.986275619 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3846153846 23.4991977007 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.84615384615 5.21951772744 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 17.0 5.13820224719 331% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.111062906325 0.243740707755 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0414498625107 0.0831039109588 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0392766656623 0.0758088955206 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0802204314586 0.150359130593 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0284024670505 0.0667264976115 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 14.1392134831 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 48.8420337079 130% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 12.1743820225 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.19 12.1639044944 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.65 8.38706741573 91% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 100.480337079 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.