The users of social media, such as Facebook, Twitter, are replacing face-to-face contact in this century. Do you think the advantages of this way outweigh the disadvantages?
In today’s world of digital dominance, it is argued by some that the use of technology in communication, especially social media has a negative effect on the direct interaction among people. In my opinion, the advantages of this trend outweigh the disadvantage.
It is undeniable that people derive substantial benefits from gaining access to the social networks. Firstly, social platforms using technological devices such as smart phones which gives users countless opportunities to exchange socially. For instance, Facebook, Twitters and Snapchat are platforms which allow people instant messaging opportunities to contact with others regardless of geographical barriers. In addition, it is convenient for those who live far away from their loved ones. Secondly, it is widely used by many which allows marketer to create and distribute quality content. Most marketing companies uses Facebook for marketing, a very powerful tool for any sized business. For example, business managers can easily provide customer service, answer sales question and even upload new brands of the company through social networking service. The efficiency and easy of usage is more productive and hence so widely used than classical face-to-face interaction approach.
However, there are some real drawbacks of communication equipment abuse to direct interaction in real society. In the digital age, with the emergence of social networking websites has led people to replacing the traditional way of interaction with electronic ones. For example, it is common to see many youngsters make virtual friend online via Facebook or Snapchat instead of gathering at a small shop for their meeting. This can result in social withdrawal in the long run. Nevertheless, the onus is on the parents to limit the usage of these devices by getting children enrolled in extra curricular activities such as sports and be responsible to make time for family gathering to enhance human interactions.
In conclusion, I believe that the use of technology for communication is going to surge due to its enormous benefits. It is advisable that people should take into consideration that living away from digital devices is not realistic in this digital era. Thus, people must make the right choices to manage the use it right rather than losing control over usage.
- The chart below compares the responses of undergraduates and postgraduates to a questionnaire on their opinion about their university library Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 67
- Some people say that it is important for everyone to do something creative in their free time Others disagree Discuss both views and give your own opinion 78
- Last weekend you stayed with a friend You think that perhaps you left your watch in his house Write a letter to this friend In your letter Thank him her Explain about your watch Say what you want him to do 73
- Children s friends are an important part of their lives What kinds of influence may children s friends have on them What is the best way for parents to make sure that their children s friends are a good influence on them 73
- Today many people get married and have children when they are in their 30 s rather than when they were younger Do you think this is a positive or negative development 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 316, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'rights'?
Suggestion: rights
... the right choices to manage the use it right rather than losing control over usage. ...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 361, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... rather than losing control over usage.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, hence, however, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, thus, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1967.0 1615.20841683 122% => OK
No of words: 362.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.43370165746 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36191444098 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95998696742 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 176.041082164 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610497237569 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 635.4 506.74238477 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.1266765149 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.277777778 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1111111111 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.66666666667 7.06120827912 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168475971778 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0502210864566 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0517937796513 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0957447119118 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.041296593453 0.056905535591 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.86 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 78.4519038076 153% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.